This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[M1919 Browning machine gun#.30 AN/M2 "Stinger" field modification|.30 AN/M2 "Stinger" field modification]] The anchor (#.30 AN/M2 "Stinger" field modification) has been
deleted by other users before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors
T28?
Hello there, someone PLEASE explain to me why there is the T28 heavy in the list of equipment used? AFAIK, the T28 never saw combat and were only prototypes, somebody explain this to me please??
Max20characters (
talk)
19:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Title change proposal
I am posting to see if there are other opinions about this change. I believe that the article should be moved to a new title "List of equipment of the United States military (or Armed Forces) during World War II" or, at the very least, to change army from a capital 'A'. The article encompasses equipment used by all branches of the United States Armed Forces and it follows that the title should therefore be changed in order to comply withWP:PRECISION. Additionally, if the name retains the word army, it should be de-capitalized so as to connote army in the general sense and not the proper noun
United States Army. I have checked other articles on this topic and found some articles titled as I suggest, and some titled as this one.
MOS:MIL also provides no consistent nomenclature for articles of this type. Would anyone be against this change?--
Lenny Marks (
talk)
09:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Not sure I get the "small 'a'" part... what other army would it be? This title should remain as is, and the equipment used by the US Army also left as is. What should go is the sub-lists of other branches, that's where the page loses focus. (imho) -
wolf13:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)reply
@
GraemeLeggett @
Thewolfchild; If the consensus is simply to remove the equipment of other branches, then no title change is necessary. I had not initially noticed that the other branches' equipment seem to be limited to aircraft and sea craft, but I agree that this seems to be the best option.-
Lenny Marks (
talk)
09:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply