This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of equipment of the Canadian Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of equipment of the Canadian Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Doesnt Canada use the Humvee? 129.127.32.138 ( talk) 06:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Everyone,
This article is currently lacking Creative Commons, public domain, and other free images of Canadian Army equipment. As official Government of Canada images fall under Crown copyright, I'd like to put out a general call to the Wikipedian community to find, add, or upload images related to the content in this article. It would be best that the images are of actual Canadian Army/Canadian Forces equipment, rather than of similar equipment used by other countries. The following is a list of what images are IMO needed:
Thanks! Burnsnet27 ( talk) 23:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 21:53, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
I edited the info reagrding the Black Hornet on the equipment list. Spesifically the country of origin andthe edit was reverted. Why ?
The Black Hornet Nano is developed by Norway, not USA. so the flag should be changed. You can read up on it on the Back Hornet wikipedia site. Mortyman ( talk) 07:37, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Jusy curios 70.67.40.177 ( talk) 05:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 07:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 06:39, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
I think given its limited distribution and use, equipment used by only CANSOFCOM should be pulled out of the main tables and into its own subsection. Putting it in the main tables gives a false impression that this equipment is in wide use, especially if you skip the notes. It is noteworthy, but it is distinct and far more limited than the equipment used by the reserves and reg force. Jonathon A H ( talk) 20:15, 23 November 2022 (UTC)