This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
Both "List of cruiser classes ..." and "List of cruisers ..." will take the searcher to this page, so I'm not concerned, although I think that "List of cruisers ..." will fit in better with the corresponding articles on battleships, battlecruisers and destroyers. Might I suggest that since we have those other articles, including one of battlecruisers, we should not duplicate this by listing battlecruisers in this current article, but simply reference it in a "See also" paragraph? Meanbwhile, I have re-organised the ships in each section of this article into chronological order rather than alphabetical order (which matches our practice in the corresponding articles).
Rif Winfield (
talk)
07:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)reply