![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
I see Cadence as a product but could not find it (the corresponding Wikipedia article was deleted) except this site which does not seem to have the collaboration software product listed here: http://www.cadence-software.com/#/Products/ I propose to delete this item from the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.138.230.142 ( talk) 10:52, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
I see this platform listed in both open source and project collaboration lists; I would propose to keep in "project collaboration" section only those products that are designed with "project management" in mind, given that there is already a general list where all collaborative software products should be featuring, avoiding unwanted duplications.
There already is list of wiki software and it is long. I don't think it is worthwhile to list wikis here again. - Hapsiainen 12:53, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
Since when is Interwoven free or open source? (under product list for web based solutions). - Mimi 12:49, Dec 20, 2005 (UTC)
Teamwork also is not really open source (only the domain classes). The license is proprietary. Should be moved out of the open source section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.186.16.30 ( talk) 10:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
The 2nd reference (cite note) refers to an apparent clarification (which doesn't make sense to me), and doesn't actually support the material that supposedly provided the information in the "Comparison of notable Collaboration Software" table.
Either the reference should be linked to the actual source material, or the page marked with the text that indicates it contains unreferenced/unverifiable material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregnx ( talk • contribs) 16:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
I think Gobby deserves mention here, although I'm not sure which section it would go in. I haven't really seen anything else like it. 66.20.189.94 16:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Why no love for Google Docs here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.136.242.1 ( talk) 17:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Some links are redundant, I think it's good enough to have one project listed one time.
Projects are not sorted alphabetically, sorting makes reading better.
Can i add new software to this list?
more details about the software can be found at http://www.collaber.com
Our software is as powerfull as Microsoft Groove.. So we think it must be included in the list.
Thanks Rajesh
Please add "e-Deliberation" to the list of Collaborative Software with this descriptor: "Online platform for large group collaborative deliberation events to resolve complex problems or challenges. Yields a consent-based multifaceted strategy." The link should be to: https://www.e-deliberation.com Thank you Nisuc ( talk) 21:12, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
How can Microsoft Office Groove be Open Source / Free Software? In the corresponding article, it says it is proprietary. (Of course, I didn't even need to read the article to tell you that.) FSHero 16:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Why is open source software in its own category here, and one that dominates the list? Wouldn't it make more sense to organize it by functional domain, collaborative capabilities (Email/IM groupware vs. data visualization vs. screen sharing), or some other logical categorization? Categorizing by license type seems unhelpful. Sam 06:44, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
MessagingMatrix.com provides a much better (dynamic) grid comparison of messaging collaborative software, possibly provided certain titles & and a few attributes were added. It allows one to dynamically "Compare Microsoft Exchange, CommuniGate Pro, Novell Groupwise, Google Mail, and more here." says parent site CompareStuff.Net; and it includes Citadel/UX. So, folks, kindly add there the missing titles (as Group-Office & eGroupWare) and eventually move to there (for messaging) all the above comparison tables. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MBParker ( talk • contribs)
The article is slowly accumulating linkspam again. Please see WP:EL, WP:SPAM, WP:NOT#LINK concerning the proper use of external links. -- Ronz 16:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
The article needs some inclusion criteria for the entries, per WP:LIST. We can start by only listing collaborative software that already has their own articles. -- Ronz ( talk) 16:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
what can i say on the subject?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.226.37.15 ( talk) 20:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
My company's collaborative video post-production software looks like it would fit well here. Here are some third party references:
If anyone agrees, feel free to add FORscene to this list. Stephen B Streater ( talk) 22:44, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps it would be useful to sort this entire article into different uses for collaboration software? I feel like the topic is relatively broad, and can apply to anything (e.g. web development, programming, word processing, CAD, mathematical simulation software like Mathematica or Matlab, etc.). With this in mind, there's a collaboration-based music production software for electronic musicians and audio engineers called Ohm Studio: http://www.ohmstudio.com/. It's a standard Digital Audio Workstation (DAW) with Internet and filesharing capabilities. Betatesting should finish in January of this year. This is just one example, and I'm sure there are programs of all kinds with these same capabilities. Apologies (and disregard) if this isn't the purpose of the article. [Anonymous user] 14:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC -9)
Citrix Online's collaboration products, especially GoToMeeting, are in the top 5 in North American usage... shouldn't they be included? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.185.229.40 ( talk) 07:04, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Why not make a sort of comparison list, like with the Comparison of issue tracking systems on Wikipedia? That would make this page much more useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.89.8.160 ( talk) 12:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Whoever tagged this article should have commented as to how it needed to be cleaned-up. I have removed entries that are linked to external sources rather than internal ones (see WP:LINKFARM) and removed Wikipedia:Red links. Someone familiar with the content-matter should go through and eliminate anything that doesn't belong on the list. -- Walter Görlitz ( talk) 01:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
This page could be far more useful if tools were sorted in two additional ways:
MrLloyd025 ( talk) 20:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
-- Marclaporte ( talk) 04:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
@ MER-C, for the recent reverts, I would like to share that Banckle offers a suite of collaborative tools and like DimDim and other web conferencing alternatives; Banckle Online Meeting is one of its web based tool for conducting web conferencing sessions that comes with a free API as well to help developers creating new applications by borrowing some of its features. Since this page section List_of_collaborative_software correspond exactly with Banckle Online Meeting and the listed tools DimDim and Zimbra are its competitors so I added Banckle to that list. Please visit this blog page as a reference and read out a head-to-head features comparison of Banckle Online Meeting with DimDim. Please make sure that by referencing Banckle Online Meeting, promotion or other marketable benefits were not intended. The mentioning was made just for the sake of awareness that Banckle offer the same free API as an alternative solution for conducting Online Meetings, Live Chats and File Sharings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khozman ( talk • contribs) 00:35, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and once again removed the non-notable entries. See Talk:List_of_collaborative_software#Inclusion_criteria and Talk:List_of_collaborative_software#Clean-up_required. -- Ronz ( talk) 21:59, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
It seems odd that that IBM Lotus and Microsoft are the only products listed in tables where I seem to recall several worthy open source projects in the past.
While not quite worthy of the library of Alexandria, having a tabular listing of features of the notable open source (and other commercial) 'alternatives' to the two market leaders would be worthy. I would suggest that any project which someone cares enough about to fill in a table with its features is probably worthy of WikiPedia.
q.v. http://www.opengroupware.org/, http://www.egroupware.org/, http://www.citadel.org/, http://www.kolab.org/, and http://www.zimbra.com/
Can i add new software to this list?
The product is called Comidor and is a SaaS powertool for Small & Medium-sized Enterprises. More details about the software can be found at http://www.b-open.gr
Thank you in advance, Dimitrios — Preceding unsigned comment added by Istoidea ( talk • contribs) 13:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi. Can we add Smartsheet to the "Comparison of collaborative software features" table? I've prepared a draft entry for them below David King, Ethical Wiki (COI) ( Talk) 22:04, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Name | Wikis | Web publishing | Calendaring software | Project Management | Workflow system | Document Management | List Management | XML Forms Management and workflow | Discussion | Blogs | Surveys | Time Tracking | Business Intelligence | Charting | Bookmarking, Tagging, Rating and Comments | Social software | Enterprise search | Office suite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Smartsheet | No | Yes [1] | Yes [2] | Yes [3] | Yes [4] | Yes [5] | Yes | No | Yes [6] | No | Yes [7] | Yes [8] | No | Yes [9] | No | No | Yes [10] | Yes, MS Office Interface |
References
{{
cite web}}
: no-break space character in |title=
at position 55 (
help)
![]() | Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Hello, my name is Patricia Wagner and I'm an employee of Microsoft. I work in the Cloud+Enterprise division as a content publisher for Visual Studio Team Services, Team Foundation Server, and Application Lifecycle Management products. We are reviewing Wikipedia articles that relate to our areas and would like to update some to better represent the current state and features of our products. Please review the changes below and let me know if they are acceptable to you. Thank you very much for your consideration.
Please update this item:Microsoft Team Foundation Server, developer collaboration platform
to: Microsoft Team Foundation Server, developer and Agile tools collaboration platform
Add this item just below it: Microsoft Visual Studio Team Services, developer and Agile tools collaboration cloud platform
In the "General Inforamtion" section:
Please update the line for "Microsoft Team Foundation Server" to:
Microsoft Team Foundation Server Microsoft 2015 2015 2005 SQL Server or SQL EE Proprietary
Add a new line just below it:
Microsoft Visual Studio Team Services Microsoft Current Azure Cloud Proprietary
In the "Comparison of collaborative software features" section, please add a new line just after "Microsoft Team Foundation Server" that reads:
Microsoft Visual Studio Team Services No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
In the "Comparison of targets" section:
Please add a new line at the end that reads:
Microsoft Visual Studio Team Services No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
In the "Open source software" section:
Just after the Spicebird entry, please add a new line that reads: Team Foundation Server, enterprise-grade server for teams to share code, track work, and ship software
Just after the Teambox entry, please add a new line that reads:
Visual Studio Team Services, cloud platform of integrated suite of tools for teams to share code, track work, and ship software
In the "Groupware: Web based software" section, please add two new lines, just after the SOGo entry:
- Team Foundation Server, enterprise-grade server for teams to share code, track work, and ship software
- Visual Studio Team Services, cloud platform of integrated suite of tools for teams to share code, track work, and ship software
In the "Web-based software" section:
Please add a new line just after the Simple Groupware entry that reads:
Team Foundation Server, enterprise-grade server for teams to share code, track work, and ship software
Please add a new line just after the Traction TeamPage entry that reads:
Visual Studio Team Services, cloud platform of integrated suite of tools for teams to share code, track work, and ship software
Pat MSFT ( talk) 18:14, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Visual Studio Team Services, as that is referenced in the article for TFS as another version of TFS, which probably doesn't merit its own entry. Additionally, I have not added either to the section for open source software, as it appears to me that neither is open source. — crh 23 ( Talk) 20:56, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
I have added a brief hidden note to offer some guidance on Wikipedia's notability requirements for new editors (based on WP:GNG and general list guidelines). Please feel free to tweak my English or eventual ambiguities. GermanJoe ( talk) 15:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
I would like to understand the process I should follow to edit this page and add a link to a new collaborative software in it?
Thanks! Vishwa CTO - www.mangoapps.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishwamalhotra ( talk • contribs) 13:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)