This article is written in
American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Looking at the various "Lists of..." for types of USN ships listed in the
List of United States Navy ships directory/template, it seems that with a few variations, the majority of the articles are titled as "List of X of the United States Navy", so I don't see moving this page to include the word "Navy" at the end as controversial. If anything, perhaps the few other outliers should be changed to the same format as well..? Anyway, as for this page;
Meh. Like I said, many of the other lists-by-type have "Navy" on the end as well and I don't believe that's a new development, so this didn't seem like it would be controversial or require a discussion. It's not a big deal to me either way, if you want to move it back, go ahead. - wolf00:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)reply