This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
List of Tennessee Union Civil War units is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of
Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] •
[Project Page] •
[Project Talk] •
[Assessment] •
[Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Just a question: if this article is a "List of Tennessee Civil War units," where are the
Confederate units? Seems this article is devoted exclusively to Union units, which would be fine (in my opinion, at least) if this article were entitled "List of Tennessee Union Army units during the Civil War" or some similar title. Are there are any plans to expand this article to include Confederate units, as well? Otherwise, shouldn't its title be changed? -
Ecjmartin (
talk)
12:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)reply
It seems that the established format for states that had both US and CS units is to put Confederate only on the one list. Here the full list of
units by state. On the Kentucky Union list, I put a See Also reference to the Kentucky Confederate list. I think that's a simple solution here and will do it.
Spacini (
talk)
14:38, 19 December 2010 (UTC)reply
I agree that the title needs to be changed. For the Union states it makes sense to just list it in the plane fashion, but the example for other southern states that seceded from the U.S. (eg. Alabama, Arkansas) is to include the word Union in the title. The existing title implies that Tennessee was a Union state, causing confusion. -
Parsa (
talk)
17:30, 25 April 2011 (UTC)reply