This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please
add the following code to the template call:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
I changed Newark to New York since that is the city you want to travel to if you fly to that airport. I have been in inner city Newark, New Jersey, I can guarantee that it is not a tourist attraction. The fact that the Newark airport is located in another state is no reason to keep Newark. SAS homepage uses New York and furthermore Oslo airport is also not in Oslo state. /
BIL14:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)reply
I must agree with BIL. SAS says clearly that they service New York on their web pages. It should be noted that noone outside New Jersey who isn't interestet in or knowledgeable about aviation is aware of Newark or where it lays. The fact that there is a reference to Newark and not New York on this page can lead to falce information to people searching for information without extensive geographic knowledge (especially non-americans, who also use the English Wikipedia), and could lead people to beleave that SAS doesn't serve New York, something they most aboslutely do.
Arsenikk20:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)reply
If one is to use the same system as with New York with other airports on the list, should it not be changed to the following (for Norwegian Airports since this is the only places i have enough geographical knowledge to actually know where the places are)
Now think of the poor people desperatly looking for an airport near Oslo. As long as it is refered to as Jessheim (the town that Oslo Airport is located in) they havn't a clue where to go (thankfully the airport carries the Oslo name, and that is exaclty why). But Newark doesn't carry the New York name, ergo one gets quite a problem. Of course, anyone who lives in Eastern Norway, and probably most Norwegians, know where Jessheim is, and for them it isn't a problem. But for people from, say, the United States it could be a problem.
Arsenikk10:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC)reply
As wangi said on a different talk page, Wikipedia uses the official name of the airport. EWR is officially known as Newark Liberty International Airport, regardless of which city it serves. And as far as I know, OSL is NOT named Jessheim International Airport. We do not make things up here in Wikipedia.
Elektrik Blue 8212:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)reply
And JFK airport is officially called
John F. Kennedy International Airport without New York in the name. This discussion is about what the destination city is, not the official name of the airport. It seems that a majority (at least according to a discussion in
Talk:Newark Liberty International Airport) wants the destination to be called Newark not mentioning New York City, since the airport is in New Jersey, not New York (the state). In Europe low price airlines often serve remote airports like Oslo-
Sandefjord Airport and
Frankfurt-Hahn Airport, and they are written in Wikipedia as having Oslo and Frankfurt as destinations, even if they are located fairly far away from their destination cities. Newark airport seems to be an exception not mentioning the main destination city of its travellers. Airlines usually call the destination New York (for foreign airlines) and New York/Newark, NJ for airlines in the US. (I know, that was called a marketing trick not reality on the other discussion page, but anyhow they call it that). /
BIL23:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Shanghai?
What's the source for the information that SAS are restarting the Shanghai route? I have not found any offical information about it from the airline itself. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
130.243.248.165 (
talk)
23:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)reply
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Scandinavian Airlines destinations. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.