This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
anime,
manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
Rags, first of all, thank you for the scan. But that’s not enough to include the information in the article. See how I wrote all the information for the books I used in the References section? This is in accordance with
Wikipedia:Citing sources. I put the authors, titles, publishers, publication dates and ISBNs. You must do the same thing for all the books you used( including page numbers for the subtitle list in volume 22) or the information cannot be included in the article. --
WikidSmaht (
talk)
01:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)reply
If you say so, you buy the book yourself la!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (A******)<--Sorry, thats how singaporean likes to talk.
Ragnaroknike02:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)reply
...OK, I explained this above, but I will give it one more go. Look at the article. See the References section at the bottom? See how I recorded the authors, titles, publishers, publication dates and ISBNs of all the books I used? If you add the authors, titles, publishers, publication dates and ISBNs of Volumes 15-22 to that list, plus the page numbers for the subtitle list in Volume 22, then you can put the Ruby/Sapphire subtitles back in the article. See, in order to put information in a Wikipedia article, you also have to put where you got the information. It’s called
citing sources - get it now? --
WikidSmaht (
talk)
00:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Please stop adding/removing comma(,)s, exclamation point(!)s, and ellipses(...) to/from chapter titles in Volumes 1-7. I checked my books very carefully, and though some of your changes were correct and have been incorporated, the rest are not. At least in the VIZ versions. If those punctuation marks are that way in your books, that counts as a difference between the VIZ and Chuang Yi titles, and you should list them that way instead of combining columns. And speaking of combining columns, you mustn’t do that at all without citing your sources as I mentioned above( in this case, I presume your sources are the Chuang Yi versions of Volumes 1-7). Also, stop capitalizing the second “as” in “As Gastly as Before”, and stop removing [sic. As you can see by looking at the
sic article, the word “sic” is intentionally added to indicate that a quote taken from somewhere else( like the chapter titles) is copied verbatim and is not a transcription error. --
WikidSmaht (
talk)
01:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Yes. The books I put are the VIZ versions, so you have to add the Chuang Yi versions of volumes 1-7 to the References section if you want to put the Singaporean titles in the list, even if most of them are the same. --
WikidSmaht (
talk)
21:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)reply
FR/LG - No titles?
So, I’m not sure I understand this particular edit. Are you saying that the beginning of the FR/LG saga is included in Chuang Yi Volume 22, but with no chapter title(s)? If that’s the case, I don’t think we really need another column just to announce that. Is/are there even (a) chapter number(s)? --
WikidSmaht (
talk)
01:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)reply
In the content page, it state: Chapter 260 The Final Showdown I 6 all the way to Chapter 2637 The Final Showdown VIII 130 Fire Red Leaf Green Chapter 268 176 Chapter 269 190 As you can see, it state the chapter number and the page only... You need another scan???
Ragnaroknike02:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC)reply
OK, that’s the table of contents. There are no titles within the actual chapters either? If that is the case, I really don’t think we need to add the column just to say so. --
WikidSmaht (
talk)
06:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)reply
So, in an edit summary, you said “bk 23 out in sg, but still no title...”. Did you mean that, in Singapore, all the FR/LG chapters have no titles, just numbers? --
WikidSmaht (
talk)
21:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)reply
I'll probably do that later or tomorrow. After the internet mess I had, now I am having some problems with virus and I'm cleaning up my computer (some articles from wiki were shown blanked and if I edited one I could see I would probably replace accidentally the kanji with square since it didn't read them.).
Tintor2 (
talk)
21:29, 2 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Someone need to correct the ISBN for volume 31, it's the same as volume 30. When I searched the ISBN on Google, the result indicated the conflicting ISBN entrée is for volume 30. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
81.103.107.144 (
talk)
17:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Dear
User:Tintor2. I have moved your message here, in order to collect other opinions. In fact, I am not a regular contributor here, and you probably know better than me where to split the page. Feel free to solve the overflow problem in any way you see fit. Best regards.
Pldx1 (
talk)
16:30, 2 April 2016 (UTC)reply
I agree with Tintor that a similar approach would be appropriate. I think splitting by increments of volumes as the article is currently sectioned is better for such a long list article. (unless someone familiar with the show knows more appropriate breaks) This is a better option than a separate article for chapters that haven't been collected yet because the latter would be constantly shifting—resulting in frequent merging of information—and keeping it with published volumes leads to a more verifiable list in general with notable inclusion criteria.
Opencooper (
talk)
07:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Dear
User:Opencooper. You are welcome to proceed to any other way of solving the overflow problem. But remember that proceed means doing rather than talking about. Best regards.
Pldx1 (
talk)
12:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC)reply
I have just modified 2 external links on
List of Pokémon Adventures volumes. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.