![]() | List of Norwich City F.C. managers is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured list |
![]() | This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Greetings! I was patrolling for graffiti and typographical errors when I came upon this article, which appeared to me to be unfinished. Specifically, the beginning of the third paragraph seemed to be missing and there were a number of stub sentences and "xxxx" placeholders for words and phrases. I made a good-faith attempt at correcting some of these, but I also removed others, with the rationale that the incomplete fragments should not be in the article until they are ready to be "fleshed out". Hopefully, I didn't make things worse, and I apologize if I mangled the meaning of any part of the article. Please feel free to pick up where I left off. -- Bgpaulus ( talk) 14:39, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
I was thinking about how periods of stability and instability could be illustrated. I wonder whether a graph would work? Perhaps with years on the x axis with bars showing how long the incumbent was in place? -- Dweller ( talk) 23:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Much as I love the neat table, I have two problems with it. First, it is seriously out of date, because Lambert would now come top of the table, but saying as much reeks of OR. Secondly, it is merely restating in slightly different form what anyone can do for themselves by clicking to order the managers table by win %. Win % is, it seems, the normative way of comparing managers of different eras, presumably exactly because of the change in the rule for how many points were earned for a win. I think we should simply remove it. Views? -- Dweller ( talk) 19:42, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi If we show Walker's two reigns in one row, we lose the chronology. If we show them in two rows, his overall stats cannot be compared with other managers. Views? -- Dweller ( talk) 12:20, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
I think that the history section is going to be big. So big, this is going to be more of an article than a list. Thinking of a page move to Norwich City F.C. managers - much like what happened with the similar article we once worked on for England managers. -- Dweller ( talk) 17:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
The list defaults to chronological order, but if you click to put them in some other order, it won't go back into chronological unless you reload the page. Any ideas how to fix? -- Dweller ( talk) 13:53, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
I think indicating Hall of Fame members in the list would be useful. How about bolding their names? -- Dweller ( talk) 14:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
List of Norwich City F.C. managers. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:08, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Instead of linking to 1988–89 FA Cup by simply linking 1989, all Easter egg links here need to be fixed. Dweller, this is low-hanging fruit on an initial run. The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
More than half the prose seems to deal with NCFC managers post-1992. Suggest the blinkers come off, let's strip out the fandom. The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Sections run roughly as follows:
So, 90 years=9 parags and 23 years=15 parags. Hmm.
I think:
-- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 11:15, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Update on this:
It's still balanced towards the most recent. Open to comment on this. -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 16:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
We've got a big problem with Soccerbase links. I tried a few at random and nothing really worked as I'd hoped. Archive.org perhaps... The Rambling Man ( talk) 13:38, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
You must have the league finishes, from when you did the graph. -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 14:17, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
"The "59 Cup Run" as it is now known locally,[11]...................................." ? The Rambling Man ( talk) 14:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks OK to me?!?! -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 14:15, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
I propose to drop all mention of caretaker managers from the prose. It's already so choppy 'so and so appointed, did well, did badly, sacked, replaced by so and so', it'll help. It'll also deflate some of the length of the recent years section. Agreed? -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 10:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)