This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please
add the following code to the template call:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
I find them helpful, I appreciate you're point of view. I read tho that they are allowed to be used as I said before. I would enjoy it if they could stay. Thanks.
Several destinations in the terminated section are referenced to blog submissions from aviation related sites. For instance, the inclusion of New York is referenced to an entry in which the writer admits not knowing for sure if this information is accurate. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.202.34.28 (
talk)
04:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Terminated destinations
The terminated destination format has been on ongoing debate to how it should be layed out. I have accepted how it should be layed out, for example
Asia
United Arab Emirates - Abu Dhabi
but I feel this is not living up to full standards and therefor I have changed the style to keep it on the guide lines but to link the continents, countries and the cities as it is much more effective and useful. Comments welcome.
Zaps93 (
talk)
11:09, 31 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Not a change for the better, IMO. In any event, why make a selective edit only here? Why not discuss at the project page first? amd what is "full standards"? Whose "full standards" are these?
Jasepl (
talk)
12:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Sorry bad choice of words 'full standards' that is, but I feel it is an improvement to the page, maybe you don't feel so, but like you said its you opinion and I am not gotta argue with your opinion. I feel it is better as it links the cities which aren't listed on the page, like you would have to go to the top of the page to search for
Abu Dhabi when you could easily click on the link. I shall put my point across at the page. Thanks,
Zaps93 (
talk)
13:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Sorry Zaps/Joey, how can a decision be made, when it hasn't been brought up for discussion? You made the change several days ago to suit your preferences without discussing it appropriately. And it's still not been discussed. My view is to retain the original agreed-upon format until (if) your version gets consensus. Thanks.
Jasepl (
talk)
19:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)reply
That's incorrect information I'm afraid. I thought it was correct myself, but looking in to it, they revamped their old website
www.iraqiairways.co.uk and relaunched it in December 2009. It lists every destination except Malmo and Frankfurt. If what you say 'Malmo is a charter' we do not list it, if it was seasonal we would. Hope that clears up any info.
Zaps93 (
talk)
23:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC)reply
It's not a proper one, all that information seems false compared to the new one, the new one also includes Arabic and as for the map I'll sort it now.
Zaps93 (
talk)
19:52, 24 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Map is still wrong it shows Myanmar as Vietnam, and dosent show Yougoslavia, USSR, E & W Germany N & S Yemen nor united Czechoslovakia a sthey were back then.
I have just modified 2 external links on
Iraqi Airways destinations. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.