This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Role-playing games Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The page has been flagged for lacking sources. However, the page is essentially itself a list of sources (i.e., the "source" for 3rd World being a Star Hero book published in 2011 by BlackWyrm Games would be 3rd World, published in 2011 by BlackWyrm Games, and so on). In practical terms, adding a "source" for each product would just repeat the same information already in the page, just in a slightly different format. Would this actually be useful to anyone? Derekfnord ( talk) 02:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC) reply