This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: Southern California This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Southern California task force. Comedy This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Lists List‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles List This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Romance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Television: Episode coverage This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force. United States: Television This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American television task force.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Crazy Ex-Girlfriend (TV series) was copied or moved into List of Crazy Ex-Girlfriend episodes with this edit on March 15, 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

This is a PG-13 rated show. Ergo no one needs to know everything that happened at the end of the finale. - Jasonbres ( talk)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Something needs to be fixed about Paula and josh and I want to fix this instantly. Please let me do so. 2602:306:8B43:94F0:19A7:8745:615C:FBC0 ( talk) 21:04, 30 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Request denied. - Jasonbres ( talk) 21:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis ( talk) 21:37, 30 May 2016 (UTC) reply

He just wants to add that Josh and Rebecca had sex again. That's why I denied it. - Jasonbres ( talk) 22:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC) reply

I removed all Season 3 summaries as every single one appears to be a copyright violation, i.e. taken from press releases. Please see Futon's episode links to compare. — Wylie pedia 00:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC) reply

However the timing of this removal is highly suspect as the season finale airs tonight. I do not believe this to be a good faith edit. In addition only my episode summaries were targeted. - Ckliffames1-- ckliffames1 ( talk) 00:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Timing coincides with my visiting from Futon Critic's listing of shows that air tonight. Then, I noticed similarities. "Your" episodes were "targeted" because you copypasted every one since the beginning of Season 3. [1] You even once reverted Brojam's attempt to remove copyvio. It's nothing personal, just policy. — Wylie pedia 00:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Fine. I have a team of people working on replacing the episode summaries with "non-copyright" descriptions and summaries. Your timing sucks and your policing of this page sucks. I'm sure you love going around doing stuff like this but just know I am pissed at how much work this will involve because you want to play wikipedia cop. At least a heads up to the issue would have been better than just removing everything so that the page could have been edited and live for the finale tonight when traffic would be at it's highest. But oh well nothing can be revised or reversed now without me getting locked out so thanks for ruining everything.-- ckliffames1 ( talk) 02:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The first season and most of the second season's summaries were left intact, most likely because someone took the time to write the summaries in their own words, as suggested by most copyvio guidelines here at Wikipedia. ( Example.) There's nothing whatsoever wrong with doing so. However, waiting a day, a week, or infinity to remove copyvio'ed additions would not solve anything, but I'm an idiot so what do I know? — Wylie pedia 05:26, 17 February 2018 (UTC) reply

So in order to resolve this do I need to submit my own written summaries through you so that you don't revert them because I use character names or plot locations that are included in "copyvio'ed (whatever the Frick that means)" material? I don't want so spend the hours and hours it's going to take to re-write everything and reformat everything all over again only to have you revert it again. ckliffames1 ( talk) 09:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC) reply

I would create a sandbox page, just to write and tweak them as necessary, then link it here for others to look at and maybe help work on. Use the press releases as a guide if you must, just don't change a couple of words (paraphrase). Heck, just expand on them if you need to so the gist is known. Most CV police are very flexible. — Wylie pedia 18:13, 17 February 2018 (UTC) reply