This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please
add the following code to the template call:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Most sections are not properly rerferenced. May be a candidate for deletion, and have info returned to main article, if not referenced properly.
LanceBarber
References were added, probably some copy editing and cleanup may be required but I don't see any reason for deletion / merging with original article. Regards,
Piotr Mikołajski11:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Piotr, Thank for your updated referencing. If you or one of your associates could added some refs to the upper USSR and USA sections would be helpful and complete the cleanup. I also updated the Stub to a Start class. It is pleasure seeing your edits and updates to this and so many others articles. Thank you again, Lance.
LanceBarber17:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Lance, I've added some more info and references. If you have one of listed Osprey or Squadron/Signal books you can add a lot of info about WWII era USAAF B-29's Bomb Wings, Groups and Squadrons. I have no enought time to post all these info but with those two books WWII period should be complete. Regards,
Piotr Mikołajski21:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)reply
I've added WWII B-29 units from Osprey book and split USAAF/USAF section to two separate ones. It seems that USAF section needs cleanup and referencing the most.
Piotr Mikołajski07:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)reply
In reviewing the S/S book and the refs in the article, they both the same. The book has details on the wings, groups, and squadrons, that could be added here, OR with a lot of time create wings articles with copyedit info. Would take a lot of time... or even research the lineage of each one and update existing articles... a lot of work. What really is needed is a list of all wings and squadrons that B-29s were in during the Korean War. May already exist in Wiki.... don't know. Maybe for starters, add more detail here, and see how it goes...
LanceBarber04:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
List of B-29 Superfortress operators. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.