![]() | List of Arsenal F.C. players is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured list |
![]() | This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of Arsenal F.C. players (1–24 appearances) was copied or moved into List of Arsenal F.C. players with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Can anyone find the time to dig up missing data from any reliable sources!-- Wikipedian DOG 17:16, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
I'm working on a similar list for Watford players. I was wondering, does this list include war appearances? I don't know whether to include them or not. Also, when a player is listed as an inside forward did you categorise them as a forward or a midfielder? Think that's all I need to know right now! HornetMike 00:56, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Why does a player have to have at least a 100 games played for the club? Who made that rule? Surely a player can be considered notable with less games than that.
If you try to sort descending on appearances - to look at those players with most appearances for the club - then it isn't working properly e.g. Morris Bates with 73 sorts immediately above David O'Leary's 722.
There is a fix here if anyone fancies the work. Struway2 | Talk 15:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
The picture of "Thierry Henry" is Carlos Vela. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.106.179 ( talk) 19:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was: Not Moved. Station1 ( talk) 05:48, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
List of Arsenal F.C. players →
List of Arsenal F.C. players with at least 100 appearances — Per the discussion following at
the FLC for "List of Athletic Bilbao players" it was decided proposed that the title should include (some of) the inclusion criteria, as capping at X number of appearances was deemed arbitrary.
Sandman888 (
talk)
12:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose renaming Birmingham list, whatever the general arguments about renaming. List of Birmingham City F.C. players isn't arbitrarily capped at 50 appearances. It's a complete list of all players having appeared for the club's first team in senior nationally- or internationally-organised competition, from which a sub-list List of Birmingham City F.C. players with fewer than 50 appearances has been split on grounds of size. I'd have no problem with recombining them into a single list, but 240kb, most of which would be in a single section, the players table itself, would cause loading and editing problems for many of us. In two parts, 88kb and 138kb is still enormous... Anyway, as a complete list it's already correctly named. cheers, Struway2 ( talk) 15:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose based on the simple idea that we can do as per Birmingham, create a fork for players who "don't" meet the criteria. Birmingham have a good list which covers this, in most other lists, this is covered by
Category:Ipswich Town F.C. players (for example).
The Rambling Man (
talk)
15:48, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose my understanding is that the only reason these articles do not include all players is due to the length of size the article would become, and this is/should be clearly explained on the list pages. It therefore seems unwieldy to add the apps qualifier to the article titles, especially as the qualifier will be different depending on the club. In addition, a number of the lists will include notable players below the apps threshold, thus making the suggested amended article name incorrect. Eldumpo ( talk) 22:40, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose persuaded by the excellent arguments made, there is no need to rename footy lists. Sandman888 ( talk) 11:51, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Fabregas newcastle emirates.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 21:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Fredrik Ljungberg portrait.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 09:03, 7 December 2011 (UTC) |
I'm new to editing Wikipedia and I seem to have fudged my attempt at adding Alexis Sánchez to the list. Could somebody please rectify my error. Thank you for any help — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.235.140 ( talk) 22:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Arsenal F.C. players. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:36, 6 October 2017 (UTC)