This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of
Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article was
copy edited by
Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 18 January 2018.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
It's actually officially Life is Strange: Before the Storm, with a non-capitalized I. Please someone correct that. You can check it on the official website for the game. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Meyerliane (
talk •
contribs)
20:39, 25 August 2017 (UTC)reply
I don't think there is a way where you can edit an article's main title. If there is, I wouldn't know how to do it. Maybe someone else could help. But yes, you are right, 'Is' in the game's title does not have a capitalized I. -
Lwilsher0212:30, 26 August 2017 (UTC)reply
You are right that according to convention it should be capitalized, but since it's the title of a work of entertainment I think creative liberty takes over. Interestingly, the first game has the capitalization right within the game but is very inconsistent about its use in storefronts and social media. I'm not even sure the publisher is aware of this.
81.82.196.81 (
talk)
10:38, 7 March 2018 (UTC)reply
I want to upload a picture featuring the deluxe edition of L.I.S: Before the Storm Deluxe Edition but I am worried about copyright claims. What should I do? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Lwilsher02 (
talk •
contribs)
18:21, 23 June 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Lwilsher02: So, unless the picture is free (meaning the creator of the picture released it under a free license), it needs to significantly contribute to the reader's understanding of the topic. For most game articles, this means that in addition to any free images (such as photos of dev team members), we can just include one picture of the standard cover art and one screenshot of typical gameplay. Unless the look of the the deluxe edition has been discussed a lot by reliable sources, I do not think it would warrant the addition of a new non-free image.--
IDVtalk20:40, 23 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Agreed - if nothing else is said it's assumed it's an official prequel, so the only time you would use it would be if you're comparing it to some unofficial fan work.--
IDVtalk08:29, 6 July 2017 (UTC)reply
It just makes clear that its official and not fan made or otherwise. Its hardly a big deal to include it, its not like its whole paragraph, its one word.
Helper201 (
talk)
17:28, 6 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Unofficial titles aren't always pointed out, even if they should be. It's not reverse logic, as I'm not the one making a big deal out of it. Also "unambiguously phrasing" makes no sense. I think what is currently there is clear.
Helper201 (
talk)
18:44, 6 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Reverse logic: having to make clear it is official, when there would be no question regardless of its status
A big deal: me apparently starting this discussion about the word "official".
There's no connection between the two things. It is unnecessarily unambiguous because we're stating the obvious, it's something that doesn't need to be clarified. Take a look at
WP:VG/FC, which is the best work done on video game articles. This is a rhetorical question: would unnecessary words like "official" be used in those?
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK19:46, 6 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Facts Repeated
Ok, so, in the infobox to the side of the article, we have the release dates for the episodes shown there but we also have a table that is doing the exact same thing. Would it be better to just have it all in the infobox or would we need both the table and the infobox showing them? And would it be necessary to have "Farewell" listed as one of the episodes even though it is DLC? -
Lwilsher0212:41, 26 August 2017 (UTC)reply
"James reveals that the woman they saw him kissing was Rachel's biological mother" - now I'm confused; so does Rachel have a non-biological mother, presumably the woman whom James is cheating on? How does Rachel not know who her biological mother is?
She was adopted, and this being a story twist, I don't know how to clarify other than specifying with "biological".
Undoing an edit with a clear edit summary for no good reason.
I'm not sure how to tag a user as it's been many years since I've edited Wikipedia, so if someone could do it for me that would be great, or maybe the editor concerned might consider reading the talk page before throwing another incorrect revert out.
The Metro source states that the third episode was the least compelling of the three, not that Chloe and Rachel's relationship was the least compelling aspect of the story.
I explained this in my edit summary however the edit was undone without any comment or message on my talk page, not sure if the editor concerned assumed they could just do whatever because I'm editing from an IP?
Here's the paragraph from the Metro article that clearly states that the "least compelling" comment was in reference to the episode as a whole, not the relationship as explained in the wiki page:
In story terms the most interesting part of the game has been watching Chloe’s relationship with Rachel evolve. But while we’re not going to be churlish enough to drop this third episode’s score any lower than the others, we have to admit that overall it is the least compelling. Partly because the first hour or two is simply spent dealing with the aftermath of the last episode, and partly because the story’s ending is limited by having to tie-in to the beginning of the first Life Is Strange.https://metro.co.uk/2017/12/20/life-is-strange-before-the-storm-episode-3-review-hell-is-empty-7173599/
Not sure how you can get "Metro saw the relationship between Rachel and Chloe as the least compelling aspect" from a paragraph that clearly states it was the most interesting part...
86.3.102.123 (
talk)
04:27, 19 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Bonus episode reception
I have just added a paragraph about Farewell's reception, which I would like to keep as notable websites have reviewed it. Previously, I had added a Metacritic score for Farewell, however I was kindly notified that this was previously disputed by @
Cognissonance:. I don't have much of an opinion on the topic, but the MC score is more fitting now that there is a paragraph below in my opinion.
IgelRM (
talk)
23:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)reply