The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Remove any content that was created by undisclosed paid Joshua Halpern.
While my own edits followed COI and the Articles of Creation, it appears that this previous editor did not. Would someone be able to rewrite/clean-up this article to remove anything edited by Joshua Halpern? I will not make the changes myself since COI editors should only propose changes.
Miniland1333 ( talk) 17:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Since the article is so short, I have attempted to write a draft to either cut or replace all work done by Joshua Halpern. Would someone be able to look over this draft and let me know what needs modification? It is pretty bare-bones right now so there isn't much left to cut. I have tentatively added a stub status to the bottom of the draft, though I did not find a specific stub type that was obviously applicable. Also Psiĥedelisto thank you for your guidance. Thank you reviewer for your time.
Miniland1333 (
talk)
18:25, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
I have added the license information to the info panel. While almost all content is CC licensed, there are some exceptions which is why we can't say ALL. Some use less common licenses for content such as GPL, and there are a small few that LibreTexts has been given permission to make publicly viewable but are All Rights Reserved. This may also be relevant: "Unless otherwise noted, LibreTexts content is licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 3.0." Therefore, maybe we should change the infobox license to read CC-BY_NC_SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted? Miniland1333 ( talk) 18:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Fix whatever the citation error is for reference 10
In the references, there is a generated error that Cite error: The named reference ":2" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). I am not familiar with what this error is, so I was hoping that some other editor would know how to correct this. I think it may be that the reference 10 citations within the article need to be re-added in.
Thank you for your assistance Miniland1333 ( talk) 18:53, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Add reference to 501(c)(3) status to infobox.
LibreTexts has now been confirmed by the IRS to be an official 501(c)(3) nonprofit. [EIN: 84-5160503, verification available at https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/]
Would you please add this information to the infobox? Thank you!
Miniland1333 ( talk) 03:14, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Increasingly, LibreTexts topics are being cited in articles, at least in the chemistry project. It is a favorite for students doing homework. The articles in LibreTexts lack references, as far as I can see. I doubt that these references are reliable. If they are, I guess they might count as primary sources, not the elevated WP:TERTIARY status accorded to textbooks. I would be interested in views from others.-- Smokefoot ( talk) 17:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)