This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sociology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Politics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. International relations This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I've flagged the criticism section because it sounds less like criticism of Moravcisk, and more a bad, densely written conspiracy theory. If someone knows of any criticisms of Liberal intergovernmentalism (and lord knows there's enough), please clean this Steffaction 13:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Steffaction reply

I propose to merge Intergovernmentalism into Liberal intergovernmentalism. I think that the content in the former article can easily be explained in the context of the latter concept. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 13:54, 27 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Oppose Not necessary. If these two articles must be merged, it should be the other way around. 2001:8003:9008:1301:508:DAFC:A80:67EE ( talk) 01:11, 17 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Closing with no merge, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain ( talk) 13:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Most of this article was written by anonymous SPA editors. Based on their editing activity, I strongly suspect these anonymous IP addresses to be a single person, who is also one of the authors discussed in this article. Daask ( talk) 21:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reply