![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
"The money lent under the Advances to Workers Act (1906) led to the construction of 9,675 houses by 1919 led to the construction of 648 houses by 1919"... this is an error I take it? Hopefully someone with better than knowledge than I can correct it. Timeshift ( talk) 22:14, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
The article is currently called 'First Liberal Government of New Zealand'. Why the 'first' bit? It was the only Liberal Government that we have had. Am I overlooking something? It should be 'Liberal Government of New Zealand', shouldn't it? Schwede 66 01:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:00, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
First Liberal Government of New Zealand → Liberal Government of New Zealand – As per my query above. Yes, there was the United Government later on, and the United Party was the successor to the Liberal Party, but the parties and governments had different names, and the 'First' bit should thus be superfluous. Schwede 66 02:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Liberal Government of New Zealand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:29, 22 December 2017 (UTC)