Leave No Trace is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
Scouting and
Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations,
WAGGGS and
WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Backpacking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BackpackingWikipedia:WikiProject BackpackingTemplate:WikiProject BackpackingBackpacking articles
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.
NPOV
This article has nothing against the LNT movement. It reads like an advertisement for LNT. It should definitely have a criticisms section.
Jesuschex22:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)reply
John M. Turner critcized the movement in "From Woodcraft to Leave No Trace ...", in the journal Environmental History. Here's a link:
[1] (PDF). I'll put up some of his arguments soon.
Jesuschex15:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Fascinating. I think this would be great to incorporate into the article: right now, the article has no historical/political background. After a very quick read, I don't see Turner as against LNT, but pointing out the 180 degree turn that the philosophy of wilderness use took over the last 70 years. That can easily be made NPOV and incorporated into the article. Thanks for pointing this out, it's really interesting.
hike39518:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Christian Nobel outlines some of LNTs short comings in "Leave No Trace killed Woodcraft... almost" on the page masterwoodsman.com. Here's the link:
[2] I think incorporating the points about LNT limiting the perspective to "anything that alters nature is wrong", loss of skills and knowledge, and corporate financial background of LNT should be include.
I changed
Minimal impact code and
Pack it in, pack it out to redirect to this page. The articles had no references and most of the orgs in the External Links sections espouse Leave No Trace. With their removal, I took the trad climbing link and the two "See Other" links on the disambiguation page and put them in the See Other section on this page, which removed the need for a disambiguation page. I could see the case for a disambiguation link to traditional climbing, if someone wants to put one up, but I don't think there's a case for a separate disambiguation page.
Banaticus (
talk)
12:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Everett Ruess as possible source of LNT
A quote from him, as shown on his wikipedia page: "When I go, I leave no trace." There is no mention of him whatsoever on the LNT article, could be a useful addition. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.82.132.241 (
talk)
14:03, 5 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Requested move
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Leave No Trace → Leave no trace – Technical request contested as controversial. Per
WP:NCCAPS, this article is about a general ethos and slogan, not a proprietary concept or proper noun. It seems to be used as an acronym, which leads some people to overcapitalize the full phrase; compare to
amusement with prize. The title isn't the only case where this article is uppercase crazy, although it may be a relic of when the article was about an organization called Leave No Trace. --
BDD (
talk)
16:15, 16 November 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose Generally when Leave No Trace is referenced (the principles, not the organization) it is always capitalized, including by the National Park Service. I actually cannot find anything that has it not capitalized. Since capitalization is the widely-used format, I don't think we should be the first ones to try and change that. On a side note, the LNT Seven Principles are
copyrighted by the organization so that may affect wanting to change it to lowercase since they always capitalize it. Similarly, the organization always capitalizes the individual principles too, which I think is what you are referring to as "uppercase crazy," so I think those should remain capitalized.
Deflagro (
talk)
19:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose The article is about both the ethos and the organization that promotes the ethos. Check the second half of the article. The organization should be capitalized, so the article title should be capitalized. —
hike395 (
talk)
20:47, 17 November 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Backcountry and Frontcountry Principles Combined
There are no longer separate principles for "backcountry" and "front-country". There is only one set of the
Seven Principles of Leave No Trace.