![]() | Daily page views
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Scotlandite and mattheddleite be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Growing up in the area and regularly visiting both Wanlockhead and Leadhills, I learnt that Leadhills was the highest village in Scotland, and the second was Wanlockhead. Tomintoul was a distant third, being only able to claim the title of "highest village in the Highlands" (1132 ft). The current articles on both Wanlockhead (1304 ft) and Leadhills (1460 ft) claim "second highest", with no reference to "highest", though the Tomintoul entry awards the title to Wanlockhead! Should we not clarify this issue? Anarchie76 ( talk) 21:50, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Leadhills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.nmrs.org.uk/publications/pdf/BM19/BM19-5-14-pumping.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)