Lavender Haze has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Lavender Haze is part of the Midnights series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Lavender Haze appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 November 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
The result was: promoted by
RoySmith (
talk)
23:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Converted from a redirect by Lk95 ( talk). Nominated by Unlimitedlead ( talk) at 21:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC).
I think the writing credits should be divided between Lyricists and Composers like the Wikipedia page for shake it off since we have the Sounwave Rolling Stones article talking about the song writing process. So it should be: Lyricist: Taylor Swift Composers: Taylor Swift Jack Antonoff Zoë Kravitz Mark Spears Jahaan Sweet Sam Dew 41.62.138.154 ( talk) 07:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Adog ( talk · contribs) 05:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Continuing my streak of reviewing songs, I will also add a personal song review that has no bearing on the actual review itself. I will have this article fully reviewed on either Sunday, August 20 or Monday, August 21. I have not listened to Taylor Swift in such a long time besides the contemporary Anti-Hero (song). I like that one, this one is also on that album, so let us give it a spin! Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 05:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Writing for Wikipedia, a dog described the song as an "ethereal tune of love" that highlights both "the pop of songs and a comfortable walking-pace beat meant for a dance of two". The dog described the themes of the song akin to that of "wanting to see the world through the rose-colored lens', but in reality, having a rosy retrospection". The dog further emphasized how the song's beat reminded him of Your Love (Nicki Minaj song), and praised its bridge for its rhythm and rhyme. Closing the review, the dog stated although it would not make his Apple Music (and yes, not Spotify or Tidal) playlist, the song has a uniqueness that can both relate to its audience and reflects Swift's personal fame in the limelight. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 01:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
OK! As an introduction to my recent reviews for GAN, the following are suggestions for sentence structure and grammar during my first skim through of the article. If there are any changes that are not appropriate for the text or change the text's content, feel free to disregard them with a comment. For this review, I will do a full read-through, then a skim of the text the first go:
According to Swift, the title is a 1950s-dated common phrase referring ...I would replace "is" with "references" for better wording.
The single peaked at number two on singles charts of ...Possible missing word "the" before "singles".
The "Lavender Haze" music video ....
setlist?
... Midnights, at the 2022 MTV Video Music Awards on August 28for context, I would put the year after this first instance; with subsequent instances in the paragraph omitting the year.
track listwhen possible?
... reveal the track-listI would replace the second instance of "reveal" in the same sentence with "disclose" to avoid repetition.
Beginning on September 21, 2022, Swift began unveiling the track-list ...Two things here, to avoid repetition with the word "beginning", I would change "began" and the following word to "started to unveil". Track list fix here.
The first four songwriters produced it and used ....
Critics said ...Music critics here? If they are not all music critics, it should be ok then.
They called it a song ...I would specify who called the song, some music critics, specific ones, or a variety of music critics.
The lyrics are about the tabloid scrutiny and online rumors that Swift and Alwyn facebe in the past tense or is present tense usually the norm.
"Lavender Haze" received critical acclaimHere, as in the suggestion above, I would describe if this was from music critics. If not, it is ok. If you are up to it also, the intro sentence may benefit if the reviews have a common theme to highlight.
She became the first artist to occupy the top 10 spots of the Hot 100 simultaneously.
Midnights also became the first album in history to contain 10 top 10 songsI would change the first "10" to "ten" to help differentiate between the two, and as used later.
Elsewhere, "Lavender Haze" has peaked ...be redundant as there is a chart further down in the article that contains the same information in the box? I would consider omitting this or provide further analysis from the sources.
The video intercuts between Swift in the pool and in the lavender before cutting ...I would remove the second "in" as extra words. The lead "in" should suffice.
The walls suddenly fall down, revealing the house to be afloat in space, and then leaving her on a cloud surrounded by the floating koi fish. Two things here, I would omit "down" and remove the comma after "space" for easier flow.
Alright, for the full read-through and skim, it looks good besides minor corrections or omissions. I will do spot checks on the sources before an all-clear can be given. It is looking good. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 01:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
The article has broad coverage of the contents of the song, in addition to a grandeur focus on the subject. The article is neutral towards its subject, presenting a good balance of perspectives and tone. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 01:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
The article is illustrated with various images that are relevant to its contents. The images seem to have the proper paperwork. The article is stable with no ongoing or active edit conflicts. The history has some reversions, but all or mostly from anonymous users for vandalism/addition of unreferenced content/not appropriate. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 01:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)