![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article contains phrases and unsourced claims such as 'The major evil consequences of it has been the old bill' and 'The state should further contribute towards some form of welfare payments.' and' There has been no provision for a compulsory Social Impact Assessment and lastly no recognition of an indigenous rights'. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:47, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
This Indian law is an old European history transferred to India by invaders.This property law in Indian history has three paltry characters to rule humans.Brahmins Kashtriya and Vaishya. Legalization is under government.Constitution has formed the government and describes the importance of socialist economy.As per constitution there is no lines or words that gives place to private,personal or capitalist economy. There is no legalization of private property,so to be called "no person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law." Constitution clearly shows that the legalization of property should be under government only.This clearly makes a country socialist. Would you like to be the next Peasant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.67.30.11 ( talk) 06:09, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by
Wikipedia Ambassadors through the
India Education Program.
The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
20:16, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2023 and 14 May 2023. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Ddetchev1 (
article contribs). Peer reviewers:
Sam Shrivatsa,
Swayam6153,
Sunflowersinthesky.
— Assignment last updated by Adirrao ( talk) 22:04, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Numerous grammatical errors, such as the first sentence of the "Proposed Amendments" section, detract from the meaning of the words and create a strange flow that presents to be almost unreadable or very unclear at times with regards to what organization or party is doing what. Ddetchev1 ( talk) 19:36, 6 May 2023 (UTC)