Lake Neusiedl is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about
Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please
join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
All three names (English, German, and Hungarian) are listed in the first sentence of the article. However, the page name uses the German name. I would suggest, in order to keep more of a NPOV, and not show preference of the German over the Hungarian versions, to use the English name as the official page name. Granted, the fact that 70-80% of the coastline is in Austria is a decided advantage to using the German name. If there are no comments in the next two weeks, I'll make the switch.
samwaltz16:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC)reply
I think the German name is okay (compared with the Hungarian). But for me the question is wich name somebody uses to find the article and there I think we should prefer the English name.--
Brian6721:46, 27 January 2007 (UTC)reply
I'm curious about this as well. Few would consider the Caspian part of central Europe. If there is a bigger endorheic lake in central Europe let me know, otherwise this should really be largest, not second-largest.
Blythwood (
talk)
08:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)reply
On balance, I can't find any sources for second-largest that haven't taken their facts from Wikipedia. Largest in Central Europe unless anyone can find another citation to the contrary.
Blythwood (
talk)
08:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)reply
"The lake covers 315 km² (122 sq mi), of which 240 km² (93 sq mi) is on the Austrian side and 75 km² (29 sq mi) on the Hungarian side." I'd like to see a source of these numbers.