This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve
Laguna Negra, Catamarca, or
sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our
to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Laguna Negra, Catamarca is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
"and copepods were observed in ponds;" - "Were" can imply that the copepods were observed, but are no longer there. Maybe "and copepods have been observed in ponds;" is better
Is there a way to rephrase this section title, as copepods are also mentioned? Copepods are not vegetation, so the scope of the heading doesn't quite reflect the scope of the section
" but uranium-thorium dating performed on one oncolites indicates that it began to develop in the Late Holocene" - The use of "one" and "it" suggest that only one oncolite was tested, but then the plural is used in the sentence, so its unclear if one oncolite or many were tested.
Personally, I think this mini-section is probably out of scope. The Salar Tres Quebradas salt falt isn't considered to be part of the scope of the rest of the article' it's just a nearby feature that's briefly mentioned as part of the regional context. Since the Salar Tres Quebradas isn't part of the discussion for biology or much of the rest of the article, it seems odd to me to treat that feature as within scope here, but not in there. I'd recommend removing it, unless a strong case can be made for it being within the scope of Laguna Negra