This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Kuch Kuch Hota Hai article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Kuch Kuch Hota Hai has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article was somewhat disorganized and badly written; rewrote. User:Alwin 08:39, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Unless someone can come up with an actual critic who says that KKHH is plagiarism, I'd like to remove the allegation. Having watched both movies, I don't any plagiarism at all. Zora 06:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
KKHH a masterpiece of Indian cinema —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 91.164.232.85 ( talk) 09:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC).
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Kkhh2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 20:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Kuchkuch.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 23:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Pks1142 ( talk · contribs) 04:34, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
What does it mean? Looks incomplete.
Overall: The article meets GA criteria. Prashant talk 17:07, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Kuch Kuch Hota Hai. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
@
Bollyjeff: Hey there, since you were involved in a lot of the editing
around the time this article went to GA, I'm not exactly clear who the starring cast is. |starring=
currently lists Shah Rukh Khan, Kajol and Rani Mukerji as the stars, but the lead contradicts that, indicating that Mukerji had a supporting role. It would seem that the lede and infobox should indicate consistently the importance of whomever was credited as the stars, and I often see Indian entertainment articles confusing "starring" for "appeared in". If Mukerji got a starring credit, then the lede should reflect that. If she was a supporting cast member who didn't receive the same credit as Khan or Kajol, then she shouldn't be in |starring=
. And if there is any ambiguity about this (some films don't have "starring" credits in their on-screen credit roll, ex:
Mean Girls), then we would need to reconsider how to present the appropriate cast members in |starring=
and in the lede. Your input is kindly requested. Regards,
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
01:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
It features the popular on-screen pair of Shah Rukh Khan and Kajol in their fourth film together, along with Rani Mukerji, and Sana Saeed in her film debut.
It stars the popular on-screen pair of Shah Rukh Khan and Kajol in their fourth film together, along with Rani Mukerji. The film also marks the film debut of Sana Saeed.