This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S.
historic sites listed on the
National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles
I chose to delete the cut and pasted text from that website, which will remain available there, and to cite the website instead. This wikipedia article can be a briefer article summarizing info from that source, and/or become larger when it draws on more sources. I think it is more friendly to other editors to allow them to add to a briefer stub, than to face a block of pasted in text that is not clearly identified as one big quote without quotation marks. To write a new article in our words, it is helpful to not have that big block of text in place, in my opinion.
doncram (
talk)
04:29, 5 August 2008 (UTC)reply