This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
I observe that the article
Clebsch graph also covers two graphs in one article. They are related, one is 5-regular and the other 10-regular. The article is organised differently from this one.
Maproom (
talk)
17:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)reply
The French article only addresses the 16 vertices Clebsch graph.
I don't know whether it is correct to call the other one "Clebsch graph" as well (I did not check the sources), but it would be worth investigating that.
Wolfram mathworld calls "confusing" the usage of "Clebsch graph" by Brower et. al. to refer to its complementary, the halved-cube graph H5.
Incidentally, it seems that we have no article on no wikipedia for the halved-cube graph...
I think that the English article on Klein graphs separates better the two Klein graphs from each other than the one on the Clebsch graphs.
Hi,
according to the census of cubic graphs [1], cubic Klein graph is not Cayley. I was also unable to find any proof that the graph is Cayley (I didn't find any other source that would proof it is not Cayley though).