This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the
Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please
join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
It would appear that the move to "Kleeb lamduan" is not actually uncontroversial, and therefore a move discussion should be opened here to reach consensus. A G6 tag on the alternative title would not be appropriate. Regards,
Vanamonde (
talk)
13:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi Paul 012,
Kleeb Lamduan is capitalised because that's what all the sources I can find use, so per
MOS:CAPS, that's what we should use. Can you please remove your CSD from the redirect and reinstate my good faith changes that you reverted.
Sarahj2107 (
talk) 05:55, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
My reply follows:
Of the two English references currently listed in the article, one is a blog and can hardly be considered a reliable source, and the other is a children's book which capitalises every word in its section headers, where the article title only appears once, so the appearance there is irrelevant to the word's usual capitalisation. This regular food name is not a proper noun, and common sense would tell us that it should be treated like any other food name, i.e. uncapitalised. If you're still unsure, take a look at some news articles
here,
here,
here,
here and
here, where the dish name is never capitalised. --
Paul_012 (
talk)
14:39, 18 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Requested move 25 June 2018
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.