This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article has a lot of marketing phrases, such as "allows players to get the fun of a real-time RPG", and extolling the virtules of the management team. It was clearly written by an insider right at the time of launch and hasn't really been edited since, so I flagged it as an advertisement. dtype 15:29, 12 December 2013 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Dtype (
talk •
contribs)
Totally agree. It's pretty obvious. It reads like a press release. 20:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mvblair (
talk •
contribs)
I made enough changes that I think we can remove the advertisement flag. Feel free to stick it back on if you think it's still needed.
Mvblair (
talk)
20:45, 18 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Add Reception section so that scores from 3rd party sites can be included
Hi Pivotal Gamers, and thank you for your suggestion. I am declining this edit request for a similar reason to your other request on World of Warships. The review your website provides just calls this game "great" and gives it a score of 8.2. Ideally, reviews listed in the reception section should provide some justification behind the rating scale, because a game that is ranked as an 8.2 on Pivotal Gamers might be a 55 on Metacritic, or 7.0/10.0 on IGN, so an explanation of methodology of the rating scale is in order.
Altamel (
talk)
03:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)reply
^"KingsRoad". Pivotal Gamers. Retrieved 24 October 2016.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
KingsRoad. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.