A fact from Kileak: The DNA Imperative appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 May 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
Came here via the reassessment tag on the talk page template; bumping this up to B-class. Some suggestions for improvement follow:
It's spaced ndashes (–) or unspaced mdashes (—), not spaced mdashes, and the second time you use them in the lead would be better off without dashes at all
Plot could use some grammar copyediting
You say he engineered a bunch of lifeforms from the pyramid (how?), then talk about Kileak without explaining its relation to the pyramid
Maybe it's just the plot's fault, but the ending doesn't make a lot of sense, it seems like you're skipping a few connections
Development isn't summarized in the lead at all
The first paragraph of reception is a bit large, consider chopping it in half. Also consider arranging it by theme (graphics, gameplay, plot, etc.) rather than by publication
The reason why the article uses Kileak: The DNA Imperative is because it was the first name given to a game in an English-speaking market, which is the United States. Kileak: the Blood (the name given when it was first released in Japan) was later used for the European markets. – Hounder418:35, 19 April 2017 (UTC)reply
As directed at
WP: COMMONNAME, English Wikipedia articles should use the title most commonly used to refer to the subject in reliable English-language sources. Most English-language sources refer to the game as Kileak: The DNA Imperative, as you'd expect, since nearly all of the countries in which the game appeared as Kileak: The Blood are not predominantly English speaking.--
Martin IIIa (
talk)
16:10, 29 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Reception cites source in the future
"Jeremy Parish of 1UP.com found the game's control scheme limited compared to that of Halo: Combat Evolved and Perfect Dark."
It doesn't make sense to cite people playing the game 10 years later and comparing it to newer games. Reception should tell how the game was received in its time. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
79.22.119.41 (
talk)
16:06, 22 February 2019 (UTC)reply