This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports Car Racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sports Car Racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sports Car RacingWikipedia:WikiProject Sports Car RacingTemplate:WikiProject Sports Car RacingSports Car Racing articles
If you want to search for free-to-use images,
DuckDuckGo has a function in its image search that allows you to select only "Free to Share and Use" images. Otherwise, if you have taken a picture of the car yourself, for instance at a trade show, please upload it!
Broc (
talk)
12:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Arotparaarms I'm afraid you won't like this comment.
The website you linked is indeed licensed
Creative Commons, meaning you could upload it on Wikipedia. But... it seems like the website copied the image from somewhere else, and you can find it
here in higher resolution. So I'm afraid to say this image is most likely copyrighted.
Your best bet is probably finding a non-professional image taken by someone at a trade show and posted online with a CC license.
Flickr might be a good place to look for one.
Broc (
talk)
19:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I would suggest using the NYT source in the page, which would also solve the reliable sources issue.
What do you think?
Broc (
talk)
19:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi,
Broc. A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The
general notability guideline sets out the criteria to meet the notability requirements. Right now, the article doesn't meet them. A single review article in a reliable source or two does not, to my mind, satisfy the requirements, especially when they've not yet been added to the article.
BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!21:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
And yes, even one single review in a
WP:RS in my opinion meets GNG requirements. Here we are talking of an article on the NYT plus innumerable mentions on smaller websites.
I suggest you read some recent AfDs where notability was a concern. "One single review" absolutely does not meet
WP:GNG. If the tag remains, then interested editors may demonstrate notability by adding sources that demonstrate that notability.
BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!22:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Bastun What I don't understand is, if you believe as it seems that this subject is not notable despite the sources linked above, why not suggest it for AfD? Notability does not appear over time or just because other editors expand the article; either this car is notable (then it deserves a page on Wikipedia without a notability tag) or it's not (then it should be deleted).
Broc (
talk)
22:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Wikipedia is a volunteer project, Broc. I had some free time earlier, I did some new page patrolling, I tagged the article as I saw fit, as per our guidelines and policies. I was then busy for the rest of the evening, and where I am, it's now 23:45, and I don't have time to do a proper
WP:BEFORE, before AFD'ing an article. So I won't.
BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!23:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply