This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article is not good right now and needs a lot of work. There is a lot of information about kendama out there that could do with being brought together onto this page. The main question is what to include on the main wiki page and what can live on http://kendama.wikia.com/wiki/Kendama_Wiki SRBradley ( talk) 18:06, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
I have created a separate page for the list of kendama tricks which is currently in draft form here /info/en/?search=Draft:List_of_Kendama_Tricks . This is to stop the main page getting unwieldy and to standardise the trick names and presented format. Once it is approved I will remove the current list SRBradley ( talk) 18:06, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2020 and 13 March 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gallaz63. Peer reviewers: Abuckley3, Xqchen9, AyanoTanaka.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 01:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Possible sections to be added in no particular order
Should the two p mostly about the kendama. I think that the two pages should be split. A bilboquet discussion is mostly historical, while readers interested in kendamas are most looking for more current information. There's really no overlap in audience. The connection between the two toys is primarily historical. A bilboquet page might discuss boleros and similar toys, perhaps, but getting into that on a kendama page turns it into a bit of a mess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.148.77.146 ( talk) 05:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
inappropiate split: excessively detailed non encycopedic content DGG ( talk ) 05:14, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi everyone,
I am going to be implementing new additions to this article little by little over the next couple of days, and plan to until it almost matches my sandbox: User:Gallaz63/Kendama I plan on adding the following:
The article as a whole will still have a long way to go after my additions, but I believe my new edits will help represent kendama on Wikipedia in a more relevant fashion and make it more informative. If anyone disagrees with the new edits I make, please don't hesitate to respond to this with your concern. Gallaz63 ( talk) 07:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)