This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to
systems and
systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles
Kelly Johnson (engineer) is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
espionage,
intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, or contribute to the
discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
The anecdote about the origin of the Skunk Works' name -- did the nameless engineer answer the phone "skonk works" (as the article says) or "skunk works"? Normally I'd figure this for a typo, but knowing
Al Capp's passion for dialect in Lil Abner, I wanted to check that the original may not have spelled it with an "O". --
Paul Drye
It is Skonk Works. Source: Rich, Ben R. Skunk Works p.111.
It would be nice to get the list of aircraft that Johnson designed into chronological order. --
Rcingham
Design contributions
I'm dubious about the aircraft included on the list. This seems like a laundry list of famous Lockheed aircraft. I know for certain that Mr. Johnson was not involved in the original design of the
C-130 Hercules, because he did not approve of the design by
Willis Hawkins' team. I suggest paring down the list to only the more famous aircraft or those in which he had a clear leading role.
Skunk Works aircraft are in. Every single other
Lockheed aircraft built during his career need not be included. Any thoughts?
Logawi04:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Rule 15
Management Rule 15 doesn't show up in the referenced source. Does anyone have a reference for this? Otherwise it should be removed
It seems unlikely to me that his actual wages were $83 a month, considering that the average retail worker in 1930 was making $109/month. I know the great depression was in full swing, but it still seems quite low.
The $83/month figure comes straight out of his auto-biography, so I doubt it's false. Also, Lockheed was in serious trouble at the time, and at one point had to fire all personnel, except for the engineers (Kelly included) until they could fix a landing gear flaw in the Electra. However, he does stay he used to make much more money working with the University of Michigan's wind-tunnel, and he states that it was 10 years before he ever made as much money as he made at the university at the time. So, in my guess, it is probably true.
mjuarez05:23, 13 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Design Contributions - II
Kelly Johnson made design contributions to many of the Lockheed airplanes produced during his career timespan of 1933 through 1980, but he is mainly remembered and associated with the following:
Hudson maritime patrol bomber of WW II (developed from Model 14 Super Electra airliner)
YF-12/SR-71 Blackbird family, Mach 3, stealthy, ultrahigh altitude,long range reconnaissance (current holder of world speed and altitude records of 2,193 mph and 85,069 ft., set in 1976)
An amusing page, it lacks 1) Kelly's use of the KISS, Keep It Simple Stupid, as a design principles, and 2) Kelly's real distain for other parts of the Lockheed bureaucracy. The latter is almost too kind on this page.
143.232.210.38 (
talk)
21:47, 1 October 2009 (UTC)reply
KISS inserted (thanks!) It's unlikely you'll see this ~7-year-late response, but might anyone be able to expand upon what sorts of issues specifically he had with the "Lockheed bureaucracy"? Sounds interesting.
AdventurousSquirrel (
talk)
09:10, 23 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Requested move
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It doesn't matter if it was just a nickname; if it was the name by which he was most commonly known, it should be the article's title. Quoted nicknames in titles are awkward and make linking difficult.
PowersT15:50, 6 January 2011 (UTC)reply
It should include Kelly one way or another. I think "Kelly Johnson (engineer)" is better than "Clarence "Kelly" Johnson", since it avoid the quotes. -
fnlayson (
talk)
16:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)reply
I find myself split on this one... I generally dislike pagenames with full names unless that was the name commonly used (
Jonathon "Two 'L'" O'Neill, frex ;p). I'm also often opposed to pages using nicknames as pagenames, on the belief the page should be named for the person's actual name, with the nickname prominent in the lead. That leaves me with the suggestion the page be moved to
Clarence L. Johnson, which I imagine pleases nobody. :/
TREKphilerany time you're ready, Uhura 15:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Yes, I see nothing wrong with that title, if that's how he was known (in fairly but not excessively formal contexts) in engineering circles.--
Kotniski (
talk)
10:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Have Blue
Why does the first sentence say Johnson was renowned for directing Have Blue? As far as I can tell, Have Blue was run by Ben Rich, and Johnson had an almost-peripheral role in it. Johnson had already retired as Skunk Works director when Have Blue got started, and was of course already extremely famous for many illustrious achievements that had nothing to do with Have Blue. I'm going to rewrite the sentence if I can figure out what to put there instead; suggestions are welcome.
64.160.39.217 (
talk)
05:22, 6 May 2012 (UTC)reply
The description in the lede of Johnson as a "systems engineer" rather than aeronautical engineer seems odd to me. I wonder if anyone else has any thoughts.
64.160.39.217 (
talk)
02:23, 7 May 2012 (UTC)reply
So for some reason the U2 is listed as the only significant design that Johnson produced. The U2 is most widely known for being shot down, and set no absolute records or many records at all. His other designs broke hundreds of records. The SR-71 is possibly the most popular aircraft in history.
If any aircraft would be considered his most significant design, the U2 would be the last one. Almost every other design set a significant record for its day, while the U2 did nothing that other aircraft werent already doing.
All I can say is, "Too many cooks spoil the Wiki." Given it's already listed under Projects, I've removed it. I've also removed the error that Johnson was employed by Lockheed Martin, as he died 5 years before the merger. Sigh. -
BilCat (
talk)
10:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)reply