A fact from Kanuni (drillship) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 May 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Turkey and
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the Kanuni (ex NS37/ Sertão) is the third
drillship of Turkey? Source: "... TPAO has bought the Sertao drillship ...", "... Turkey had purchased its third offshore drilling ship ..."
[1], "Üçüncü sondaj gemisi 'Kanuni' Türkiye'de " (in Turkish)[2]
@
CeeGee: Long enough, new enough, generally within policy regarding referencing, neutrality and no copyvio detected. Hook is interesting enough, and easily verified. QPQ is fulfilled. Good to go, though I suggest (1) checking for typos (
I found a few), adding an explanation why it was arrested, and adding an explanation for the origin of its current name (mentioned in the sources).
HaEr48 (
talk)
00:13, 12 April 2020 (UTC)reply
@
CeeGee: Coming to promote this, I find the article a little confusing. Why did the Admiralty Court arrest the vessel? Can you move the sentence "A purchase offer for the vessel in amount of US$75 million was rejected by late November 2016." to its correct place in the sequence of events.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk)
05:20, 2 May 2020 (UTC)reply