This article is within the scope of WikiProject Creationism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Creationism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CreationismWikipedia:WikiProject CreationismTemplate:WikiProject CreationismCreationism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Recently cleaned up the article and improved flow.
Neutrality
This article needs to be reworded to be more neutral. Phrases such as "secretly collaborated with" and "correct the standards the creationists had passed" indicate a left-leaning viewpoint. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
207.47.25.98 (
talk)
02:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC)reply
I made a few changes along those lines. There does seem to be a lot of press coverage of this group, so seems to be notable. Sources could be added to the article.
Jaque Hammer (
talk)
12:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The phrase "secretly collaborated with" is factual. Saying "correct the standards the creationists had passed" is a proper statement, since the creationist content of the science standards was not scientific.
Liz Craig, Charter Member of Kansas Citizens For Science
72.128.27.92 (
talk)
18:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)reply