This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Kangaskhan redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Today an unregistered user has added that there's a 25% chance of capturing a Male Kangaskhan. From what I remember, Kangaskhan is one of those pokémon where all specimens are female (like Jynx and Chansey) but now I'm not so sure. Can anyone confirm either sentence?
--
Fern 12:17, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
While the baby Kangaskhan may not be playable by itself, doesn't the "substitute" model used in the Pokémon Stadium series of games look like a baby Kangaskhan? Also, that model substitutes the glitch Pokémon that are imported into the game, such as Missingno.. Please note this. -- Geopgeop 09:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
i am wondering why this pokemon has no baby form. It just seems a little creepy for a pokemon to hatch out of its egg and already have an offspring. If it where to have a Babey form it most likely would be blue like the babey in every Kangaskhan's pouch (including a newly hatched one, sorry, can not get over that fact) HHS.student
The category "fictional dinosaurs" was removed before, then re-added a while later. I have removed it again, as per the discussion on the WikiProject Dinosaurs talkpage. Please don't add it again without discussion. - pinkgothic 14:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)