![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've put down Indonesian National Dictionary, which is seen frequently enough in English, but I'm aware that other names could be equally valid. I had to start with something though, so if there's a consensus on the literal translation or any other name, I'm happy to move it.
The most recent version has included common slangs borrowed from a certain languages (e.g gopek which is a slang for five hundreds). — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
125.206.236.45 (
talk)
14:41, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Great Dictionary of the Indonesian Language of the Language Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
I have added Template:POV statement to a claim stated in the article's introduction (This dictionary is the primary reference for the standard Indonesian language because it is the most complete and accurate Indonesian dictionary ever published) as it does not read as very neutral. Maybe someone with a greater knowledge of the subject can take a look at it? Thank you, Redtree21 ( talk) 07:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)