This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the
Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please
join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose until a naming convention is clarified. There is some chance that Kamphaeng Phet Station and such are supportable as proper names of stations, but the descriptive names that include MRT should use lowercase station, as is common in guidebooks and such. Pick one, and we can fix the rest of the titles instead of making this one match a pattern the deviates from
WP:NCCAPS.
Dicklyon (
talk)
20:58, 27 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Just for the sake of consistency, I'd support this move for now. A newer discussion covering all stations can later be held to determine whether all of then should be changed. --
Paul_012 (
talk)
14:47, 8 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I have
ignored all rules and moved the article to
Kamphaeng Phet MRT Station, which was the original title of the article before a cut&paste move on 2 December 2013. It is clear from the above discussion that there's no consensus on naming conventions for the entire MRT system, and this should be figured out. In the mean time, however, there's no reason to retain such inconsistency resulting from an arbitrary cut&paste move (which has now been histmerged). --
Paul_012 (
talk)
06:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Sorry, I accidentally removed this talk item when rolling back the copy-paste move. Hopefully it's no longer relevant, but this will take some sorting out.
Dicklyon (
talk)
06:58, 8 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Move requested to
Kamphaeng Phet MRT station November–December 2016, closed as no consensus. No one noticed that there had been an earlier cut&paste move.
Unless
Dicklyon or someone else objects, I'll repeat the move of the article (but leave the talk pages alone this time). This is a reversal of the undiscussed cut&paste move from 2013, so the later no-consensus move request shouldn't have any effect on it. If there's objection, well whatever. I won't waste more time on this article. --
Paul_012 (
talk)
07:26, 8 January 2017 (UTC)reply
That's more than I want to know. I saw there was a recent history merge; another copy-paste move would again disconnect content from history, would it not? So I'm unclear on whether that's what you're proposing. If the move you propose is not controversial, ask an admin at
WP:RM to help get it right.
Dicklyon (
talk)
15:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Paul 012: The solution to a copy & paste move from four years ago isn't to do another one. Dicklyon has rightly reverted your changes. If it's important to move this article, please open another Requested Move discussion, or take the previous closure to
WP:MRV.
Bradv15:50, 8 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Sorry for misunderstanding; I read the earlier comments by Dicklyon and Bradv to mean that they were against copy&pasting but not moving the article. Since this clearly isn't getting anywhere, I'll stop wasting everyone's time. --
Paul_012 (
talk)
17:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Requested move 31 December 2017
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Whatever. You and
Bradv are the only people who previously objected to renaming the page, and Bradv has never given a reason for objecting. This can probably can be treated as uncontroversial. --
Paul_012 (
talk)
03:35, 31 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.