This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
If this statement:
“‘K’ does NOT come from ‘Kurz’ or any other German word. The letter designations for microwave bands were chosen at random in the WW II era to avoid cluing the Germans, Japanese, and Soviets in!” from the article’s edit log can be substantiated, then someone might want to add this fact to the text of this article, and change
Ka band and
Ku band, since those articles make reference to “Kurz”. —
Fleminra02:52, 14 February 2006 (UTC)reply
That "Kurtz" business is a bunch of baloney. The letters for the microwave bands derive from arbitrary letters of the alphabet that were assigned by the US Department of Defense, and a long time ago, their meanings were kept secret. Anyway, the letters that were used were L, S, C, X, and K, and then the K band was divided into three parts, the Ku (K-under), the K, and the Ka (K-above) band. So, "Ku" doesn't have anything to do with
"kurtz", but rather with "K-under", and K is an arbitrary letter of the alphabet. In other words, it was a "code name". If someone wants to insist on being picky about this, they should need to deal in the US DOD MIL-SPECS, or perhaps IEEE documents and articles can tell you.
Frequency ranges
I just corrected the frequency ranges for K and Ku band designations in the IEEE section. IEEE Std. 521 is the authority on this issue, and what was previously defined here was incorrect.
Dietlein18:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)reply