This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the
current tasks, visit the
notice board,
the attached article or discuss it at the
project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can
the article attached to this page, help out with the
open tasks, or contribute to the
discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The Long Halloween is one article because both parts were released in a close proximity to each other in the same year and then together a year later. We don't have a release timeframe for the remaining Part 2 and 3 of Crisis here nor do we know they will be bundled together. This should not happen yet as this is currently known to be a single film with two sequels on the horizon at later dates. Just because
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not enough justification to apply this change here. The remaining parts will receive their own articles in a timely manner as more information is revealed, so there is
WP:NORUSH in combining and consolidating these when we have hardly any information on the final two parts.
Trailblazer101 (
talk)
02:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS applies. While I admit it was my intention to combine these under one article in time, I was waiting until further notable information was made available for including all three parts in a singular article. The fact that a duplicate article for the combined three-parts was made without following any procedures or consulting this talk is disappointing, and I have reverted those for not doing so. Once more information is fleshed out for the other two parts, then it should be discussed whether we refactor this into an article dedicated for all three of them.
Trailblazer101 (
talk)
21:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Greetings. Today, I write you because I realized we must make an exception about this article. Because there was never any chance to publish all three drafts as separate articles, I ask your consent about merge those into one article, please.. I want to revise this draft:
Considering WB has released an
official poster confirming they treat it as a trilogy, I would now be in favor of this moving only once Part Three releases and if enough content is added about all three parts and how this is a trilogy to justify
WP:GNG. This includes reviews, production information, etc. for all three parts.
Trailblazer101 (
talk)
15:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I will also note that, should this warrant expansion into coverage of the whole trilogy, this article for Part One would be moved to "
Justice League: Crisis on Infinite Earths", not "
Justice League: Crisis on Infinite Earths (film)" as that is an unnecessary disambiguation and inherently incorrect as this is multiple films, not just one. It would also not mean that the draft you linked would be moved, but rather, those contents would be merged into this one to avoid unnecessarily splitting or duplicating content on Part One. I can always make the adequate moves when ready, though it just needs to have more detailed information on the trilogy at large to warrant this happening.
Trailblazer101 (
talk)
15:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Yup, that can work. We would just need further expansion of the contents and coverage of the other parts to move the draft for all there over onto this one, which I don't think will happen anytime soon.
Trailblazer101 (
talk)
22:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)reply
It will take time to do all of that stuff you mentioned @
Trailblazer101:. Right now, the drafts for the other two parts are incomplete with the draft to the second part not having a full plot detail. --
Rtkat3 (
talk)
13:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Fico Puricelli: Why did you move the draft's contents over in a cut-and-paste move without first consulting this discussion? Per
WP:CUTPASTE, these types of moves are not allowed as they disrupt the editing history and do not provide proper
WP:attribution for the contribution history. The draft as it presently stands still has multiple issues with its sourcing (including many unsourced actors), an excessive cast table with some characters not even having actors (so not really proving notable), hardly any reception or real-world content from sources, and no real plot for Part Two and Three. Just because Part Three released does NOT mean the draft was by any means ready for inclusion in the mainspace. There is
WP:NORUSH, and I encourage you to take your time to expand this draft before attempting to move again. Should you think it is ready for the mainspace, please ping me or another involved editor in this discussion (as I am watching it), rather than submitting for AfC or moving it like you have already done. I have reverted the moves for the time being until the draft can be fully worked on.
Trailblazer101 (
talk)
17:53, 17 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Sorry, I thought we should have immediately move the draft into an article. Besides, I don't know whom I could speak. But in the end, I uploaded the official trilogy poster. As I said, my apologies.
Fico Puricelli (
talk)
18:02, 17 July 2024 (UTC)reply
No worries, I understand the feeling of wanting to get content put out there sooner rather than later, although these things do take time. It by no means has to be perfect, though there are certain guidelines and policies we must follow with these articles. It's all good.
Trailblazer101 (
talk)
18:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)reply