This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computers,
computing, and
information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Information to be added or removed: technical architecture, significant abstractions - notably "relations", distinguishing features
Explanation of issue: This article has several flaws. It's basically impossible to discern from the article what Juju is, how it works, or how it is beneficial.
References supporting change: (Several, will add to the rewrite if the COI edit proposal receives a proceed)
@
TimClicks: I suggest you start slowly. Pick one small portion of the article that could be improved, and post your suggestion with reliable third party references. See how that goes first and go from there.
GoingBatty (
talk)
00:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Respectfully, IMO, there is no need for a specific discussion of how Canonical is trying to make money with Juju unless it is unobvious. Since Juju is free and open source software, its developers are likely to be following the same strategy as other developers of free and open source software, including Red Hat and Canonical itself (see
Business_models_for_open-source_software). —
HowardBGolden (
talk)
21:30, 24 December 2022 (UTC)reply