From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    GA Review

    This review is transcluded from Talk:Jorge Choquetarqui/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

    Nominator: Krisgabwoosh ( talk · contribs) 05:09, 6 December 2023 (UTC) reply

    Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 04:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC) reply

    Let's do it right.

    Hi Sammi! Thank you for opening another review. I just wanted to inform you that I'm in Bolivia for the month, so I may not be super quick responding. Cheers! Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 05:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC) reply
    @ Sammi Brie: Sorry for the wait. I'll get this done now. Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 21:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
    GA review
    (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
    1. It is reasonably well written.
      a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
      b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
      a (references):
      b (citations to reliable sources):
      c ( OR):
      d ( copyvio and plagiarism):
    3. It is broad in its coverage.
      a (major aspects):
      b (focused):
    4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
      Fair representation without bias:
    5. It is stable.
      No edit wars, etc.:
    6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
      a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
      b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

    Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

    · · ·

    Not much to do: just a question about the origins of a ref and textual claim for [9]. Ping when done. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 06:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC) reply

    Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

    Copy changes

    I cannot find any copy items to change. I spent several passes looking through this one. Very rare for me to say that.

    Sourcing and spot checks

    • What makes Bolivia Decide (a blog) reliable?
    • The blog is actually a mirror site that takes news articles from other publications and republishes them. Therefore, I'm certain it's a republication of a reliable source. Unfortunately, due to link rot, the original source isn't easily searchable, and since the original publication is not cited, I can't even track it down on the Internet Archive. I debated keeping it in, since it has biographical information I couldn't find elsewhere. I decided to add it and leave its inclusion up to the discretion of the GA reviewer. Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 21:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
    • 9: Not very said in source, though support and threats of withdrawal of support are noted. Would like to hear a justification.
    • The article mentions that within the span of a week, Choquetarqui's organization went from marching across the country to support the president to threatening to withdraw all its support. In that sense, I think phrases like "fluctuated one a dime" are pretty supported by the text. Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 21:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
    • 14: News article on protests led by Choquetarqui against teachers' strike. checkY
    • 16: Listing in directory of committees shows Choquetarqui in the given positions. checkY
    • 17: El diputado alteño Jorge Choquetarqui fue elegido como jefe de la bancada paceña del Movimiento Al Socialismo (MAS), informó el senador Eugenio Rojas. “Ellos (Choquetarqui y la subjefa de bancada) van a entrar a debatir el lunes a las seis de la tarde, con otros jefes nuevos, que van a direccionar este año”, informó el legislador. checkY
    • 19: See 14

    Images

    As is usual, the headshot is CC-BY-2.0 and the signature is PD.

    GA

    @ TheNuggeteer: what you did was not a proper GA review. No prose details, or a source spotcheck. 750 h+ 10:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC) reply