This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
The only reliable source i've seen is the CT SotS site; note that blogs (including his own) on
Blogspot are not reliable sources! I'm not gonna try to make the call on whether mentioning that Mertens2010.com redirects to the ext lk is more than an
SYNTH violation. Bypassing the redirect is the more straightforward and less confusing choice (users can look at the address pane, and confirm that the the URL matches what is on our article page. If you think the rdr'ing URL deserves mention, make the case, in this talk page secn, that it is notable but not a Synth-vio. --
Jerzy•
t01:18, 19 January 2010 (UTC)reply