This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
John J. McNeill is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the
Catholic Church. For more information, visit the
project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
No it's not. Be more specific. I've fixed the obvious parts. If you see specific violation then flag them here rather than a blanket approach.
Contaldo80 (
talk)
00:15, 27 March 2019 (UTC)reply
I think you need to demonstrate where it is copy and paste. That is not obvious to me. I've looked at the sources and can't see that. If you insist there are violations then flag them so we can all be clear. Don't, on the other hand, threaten me with sanctions without taking a constructive approach to fix the article. Thanks.
Contaldo80 (
talk)
00:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Maybe you should have taken a look at the amendments I made intended to ensure the article didn't do this. But I suspect you didn't look, you just reverted. Because that's your style - aggressive and rude.
Contaldo80 (
talk)
00:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Your edit was feeble, cosmetic, and superficial, compared to the profound and egregious ripoff that was perpetrated from the article sources. A complete rewrite is necessary, because the article, from the ground up, was taken directly out of the reporters' mouths, and attributed to yourself.
2600:8800:1880:FC:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (
talk)
00:49, 27 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Ok so now you're resorting to open abuse. The article was not taken out of reporters' mouths and I certainly can't claim credit for writing the article.
Contaldo80 (
talk)
00:54, 27 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Requested move 26 March 2019
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Perhaps it is overkill (I tried to match the disambig detail of "John O'Neill", another common name). I'd suggest that your recent Wiki-dramatics are also overkill: anonymous editor "2600:8800:1800:FC: etc." shows up to throw out the entire article baby with its bathwater of several sloppy verbatim cites, and being verbally aggressive while doing it. I'll wait for the WP admin's decision, but this proves that Wikipedia is still a toxic "community", with its POV, copyright vios, fifth-grade writing skills, and a libertarian indulgence of real vandalism.
Mason.Jones (
talk)
15:17, 27 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
For
legal reasons, we cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under
fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and
referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original orplagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our
guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.
Justlettersandnumbers (
talk)
14:38, 29 March 2019 (UTC)reply