If I look at the
Douglas Bader article I see that all the awards are listed behind his name. Is this standard practice?
I think the level of detail about his brother Hugh belongs in the body of the article and should be removed from the lead.
The concept of an "aerial victory" here isn't really defined. You may want to add something like —that is an aerial combat encounter resulting in the destruction of the enemy aircraft
Body
Fix the dashing.
(KG 55 – Bomber Wing 55); should use —
with his wingmen – Pilot Officer Mike Appleby and American; should use —
12-14 second burst; should use –
(JG 2 – Fighter Wing 2); should use —; there are more of this kind
crash–landing; crash-landing
Inconsistencies
Wr Nr. 2898 versus Wrk.Nr 2168; I would like to see it spelled out at least once Werknummer—factory number
Imperial War Museum
maybe link the first occurance not the second?
Question
Commanding Officer's Hind? Do you mean wingman? I have not seen this term before
Dundas' Squadron; is Squadron a proper noun here?
Do you think it would make sense to link Erprobungsgruppe 210 to Schnellkampfgeschwader 210?