This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I'm a resident of the Chicago ward where Joe Moore is the alderman, and wanted to note that the local discussion board on EveryBlock (which is fairly active) has a person who has linked links back to this article several times recently.They seem to be strongly politically opposed to Joe Moore and their notes there have been almost angry and I'd characterize them as controversial or possibly directly from a political campaign. I don't have a dog in this hunt - no interest in editing this article, but just wanted to note for any interested or more experienced editor that i'm guessing this article is less balanced than it could be (is that NPOV?), and might be more subject to vandalism. That's it! No flags cause I'm too inexperienced at Wikipedia to know how to do that well, and I'm not certain it's justified anyway, but thought I'd leave a note for those who might care. Chris.ridgeway ( talk) 17:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

I took out a paragraph with bullshit about JoMo being a socialst controlling people's lives, blah blah blah. I'm not his political ally either, but the discussion needs to take a higher road than that crap. There's enough substance to hit him with that we don't need to make up crap or put out empty insults on Wikipedia of all places. C'mon, folks! Twestgard 18:40, 13 June 2006

I have copyedited and corrected some markup on this article, also deleting unverified opinion/information. Please ensure that further changes to this article meet our high editing standards, including WP:NPOV and WP:CITE. Thankyou. -- AlisonW 21:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

All right, so now some anonymous jagoff is coming on here and claiming he's responsible for all kinds of capital improvements he didn't do. Twestgard 17:40, 18 Sept 2006

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joe Moore (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130301064551/http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20130227/rogers-park/low-crime-no-shootings-show-promising-trend-north-side-alderman-says to http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20130227/rogers-park/low-crime-no-shootings-show-promising-trend-north-side-alderman-says

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:23, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.