This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
This
edit request by an editor with a
conflict of interest was declined. A reviewer felt that this edit would not improve the article.
Hello! On behalf of Jody Freeman, and as part of my work at Beutler Ink, I will be submitting a series of edit requests in an attempt to improve this Wikipedia article, which has a significant amount of unsourced content, as well as some biased text and missing details about her career. I'll be posting requests here for others to review and implement on my behalf, and I will not edit the article directly.
Eventually, I also hope to address the "advert" tag, which was added in April.
I'd like to start with a request for the Early life and education section, which is completely unsourced.
This is essentially the same information, with added mention of Eric Hamber and without degree abbreviations. If editors consider this an improvement, can someone update the article appropriately? Cheers!
BINK Robin (
talk)
21:25, 11 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Not done for now Secondary schooling and undergraduate degrees are not typically mentioned in BLP articles. I would suggest revising this request to eliminate those elements. Regards,
Spintendo21:49, 11 October 2023 (UTC)reply
I see your point. Notwithstanding what Wikipedia may think certain degrees are, no one outside of academia really views Bachelor's degrees as anything other than an undergraduate degree. That would put in in the same category as an associates degree, which I'm sure you don't see much of in BLP articles due to its non-relevance. IMO, the mentioning of undergraduate degrees is as unnecessary as mentioning a high school diploma, but maybe I'm ahead of the curve here. Regards,
Spintendo23:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)reply
This
edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
Sorry for the confusion, Spintendo. I thought you meant to remove details about the degrees, not the institutions from which she graduated. I'm not understanding why we would mention Stanford, but not the University of Toronto, especially because this would present a gap.
I would expect Wikipedia biographies to have undergraduate details (even
Template:Infobox person's Education parameter allows degree, institution, and graduation year), and I would be interested in learning more about which educational background details should be included in biographies on Wikipedia, if any help pages come to mind. Either way, if the University of Toronto should not be mentioned, then would the following text work for you?
ApprovedI would expect Wikipedia biographies to have undergraduate details That expectation would be incorrect;
MOS:DEGREE states Academic (including honorary) degrees and professional qualifications may be mentioned in the article. A bachelor's is not an academic degree. Regards,
Spintendo17:13, 12 October 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Spintendo: I appreciate you sharing that section from the MOS. For what it's worth, the article
academic degrees clearly includes bachelor's degrees. I have asked for further clarification over at WikiProject Biographies (see
here), and invite you to share your thoughts in the discussion there. Thanks again for your help.
BINK Robin (
talk)
17:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Belatedly following up, brought in from
WP:BLPN.
MOS:DEGREE says that you shouldn't use a degree as part of the subjects name, nor should it generally be part of the lede. It is usual in biographies of academics on Wikipedia to include a brief summary of their education, including undergrad. Sourcing to her webpage or CV is ok for this kind of routine information, per
WP:BLPSPS. I'll go ahead and add the degree to the article, and fix the broken link to the faculty profile while I am at it. I don't think that she played volleyball belongs in the article, unless _possibly_ that has some substantial coverage somewhere.
Russ Woodroofe (
talk)
14:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Russ Woodroofe: Thanks for weighing in here and for updating the article. I am submitting another request below, if you're interested in a similar request I have for the Memberships section.
BINK Robin (
talk)
15:50, 17 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Memberships request
Hello again! I'd like to tackle the
Memberships section, which has several unsourced claims.
Freeman currently serves on the Climate Advisory Board of Norges Bank Investment Management, the asset manager of the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund. Freeman formerly served[1] as an independent director of
ConocoPhillips, and as a member of the advisory council of the
Electric Power Research Institute.
Editors can decide if the Form 8-K is worth keeping as an inline citation, otherwise here's my proposed replacement with additional sources for these roles:
Freeman currently serves on the Climate Advisory Board of Norges Bank Investment Management, the asset manager of the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund. Freeman formerly served as an independent director of
ConocoPhillips,[1] and as a member of the advisory council of the
Electric Power Research Institute.[2]
I'm trying to provide sources for unsourced text, in an attempt to improve the article's overall integrity. I've not proposed any specific text changes here and invite editors to update the article appropriately.
BINK Robin, I added the sources for academic fellowships and prestigious memberships. That doesn't belong in the lede (per
MOS:DEGREE,
MOS:POSTNOM), so I removed it from there; the ACOEL lists her as a member and not a fellow (and appears to use the terms interchangeably), so I changed the language in the article to match. I don't have an opinion on the other part of your request.
Russ Woodroofe (
talk)
08:51, 18 October 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Russ Woodroofe: Thank you for reviewing the first part of this request and updating the article appropriately. I will see if I can find an editor to review the second part. In the meantime, I am submitting a request below to remove the "advertisement" tag, if you're interested.
BINK Robin (
talk)
18:12, 18 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Advertisement banner
Hello again! I would like to request removal of the "advertisement" banner, which was added back in April because, according to
this edit summary, the "article [did] not contain any information regarding her recent controversy". This is no longer the case, as there's an entire
section called Controversy.
The banner encourages editors to improve the article by removing promotional content. I've identified a couple instances of text that could be considered promotional.
I suggest removing the following sentences in the
Work section:
Freeman is widely published in leading American law reviews and is one of the most cited scholars in public law across the U.S.[1]
Her work has been published in several languages; a volume of her administrative law articles was published in Chinese in 2010.citation needed
She consults regularly for government and non-governmental parties, advising on litigation and regulatory strategy.
I'm not sure if Brian Leiter's Law School Reports (part of the Law Professor Blogs Network) is considered a reliable source, and the text about having a volume published in Chinese is unsourced. I would invite editors to remove any other text deemed promotional or otherwise problematic. With the addition of the Controversy section and the removal of promotional text, can the tag be removed?
This
edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
Thanks to User:Spintendo for
updating the article based on the above request. This edit (appropriately) removed mention of the subject's books from the article's prose. This is helpful as I had planned to submit a request to convert the inline citations into a Bibliography or Publications section. Since the text was removed, I'm submitting a request to create the following Bibliography section per
WP:BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Freeman, Jody (February 15, 2021). "The EPA and Climate Change". In Barnes, A. James; Graham, John D.; Konisky, David M. (eds.). Fifty Years at the US Environmental Protection Agency: Progress, Retrenchment, and Opportunities. Rowman & Littlefield.
ISBN1538147149.
Also, I noticed Reference 15 (Council on Foreign Relations) is missing "}}" between "]]" and "</ref>", if someone could fix the formatting on my behalf.
As always, I won't make direct edits to the article due to my COI and I appreciate any questions or feedback reviewing editors have. Cheers!
BINK Robin (
talk)
20:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)reply
This
edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
Hello! I'd like to make a couple more requests for this article. As always, I will not make direct edits because of my COI.
Add the Website value to the Infobox with a URL for Jody Freeman's
official website.
Add to Work: Freeman currently serves on the Climate Advisory Board of Norges Bank Investment Management, the asset manager of the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund.[1]
This
edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
Hello again! I'd like to suggest an improvement to this biography's structure. Currently, coverage of her writings is split between the Career and Work sections. I propose relocating the following text from the Work section to the Career section, in order to group related content:
Freeman is a scholar of both administrative law and environmental law, and has written about climate change, environmental regulation and executive power. She has written on "collaborative governance".
The remainder of the Work section is about her board roles and memberships. Therefore, I propose renaming the Work section to Board service and memberships (also eliminating the current subsection heading Memberships).
If editors believe this is an improvement to the structure and flow, I'd appreciate help updating because I avoid editing entries directly. Cheers!
BINK Robin (
talk)
22:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Harvard's Presidential Committee on Sustainability
This
edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
Thanks again for your help above, Spintendo. Next, I'd like to suggest adding mention of a role that's missing from Career. Currently, the section says, "In 2005, Freeman joined the Harvard Law School faculty. She was one of a number of hires made during Elena Kagan's tenure as Dean. In 2006, she founded Harvard's Environmental and Energy Law and Policy program, a legal "think tank" for climate and energy policy analysis, and established an environmental law clinic." The article fails to mention her role as co-chair of the Presidential Committee on Sustainability. Per the following source, I suggest adding the following to the aforementioned text:
She also co-chairs Harvard's Presidential Committee on Sustainability.
Source:
Biography at Harvard.edu ("She co-Chairs the Presidential Committee on Sustainability at Harvard ...")
There are other sources already used as citations in the biography that verify the claim. The Guardian says, "Professor Freeman also co-chairs Harvard’s presidential committee on sustainability and was recently awarded funding by the university’s new Salata Institute for Climate and Sustainability to lead research on corporate net zero targets." I don't think this is a controversial request but I'm asking editors to update the article on my behalf given my conflict of interest.
Please provide the Wikilink for this role. If this is an internal role at Harvard, the subject's employment association with Harvard is already made in the article's career sectiion. Listing every role the subject has occupied is promotional, as this is
WP:NOTCV. Regards,
Spintendo03:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)reply
ConocoPhillips
This
edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
For my next request, I would like to address
this problematic text, which was added back in August. The text is biased and inaccurate, offering readers an incorrect timeline of events and including some unsourced text. I do not expect to remove this text altogether; however, I would like to propose replacing the text with an accurate and neutral overview of what transpired.
Following is suggested replacement text, which uses the same sources as the current text, plus others, in order to fully explain the situation and present all perspectives:
In light of the approval of the
Willow project and her research grant from Harvard's Salata Institute in 2023 to review corporate net zero targets, scrutiny of Freeman's role as an independent director of the ConocoPhillips board increased.[1]The Guardian described emails allegedly showing that she had facilitated a meeting between ConocoPhillips executives and a director at the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2021 without disclosing her conflict of interest in a way that fully complied with university policy.[2] The Harvard Faculty Divest steering committee, a group of professors seeking to end fossil fuel use, sent a letter to president
Claudine Gay and vice provost for climate and sustainability
James H. Stock expressing their concerns about a potential conflict between Freeman's responsibility to ConocoPhillips and the university's climate commitments.[1] The student activist group Fossil Fuel Divest Harvard published an open letter asking her to resign from the company's board.[2] The group acknowledged Freeman's climate work but criticized her effectiveness in "helping reform ConocoPhillips from the inside" and specifically referenced the Willow project.[3] Additionally, a group of former students from one of her classes at Harvard Law School wrote an open letter to Freeman. While stating they admired her "proven dedication to achieving environmental justice", they asked her to sever her relationship with ConocoPhillips.[4][5]
Freeman defended her position, calling her engagement with ConocoPhillips "positive" in helping move the industry towards a low-carbon future.[6] She explained that she had made an introduction to ConocoPhillips on behalf of her Harvard colleague John Coates,[2] who was an incoming SEC director and sought input from ConocoPhillips to educate himself on industry views as he addressed climate issues at the Commission. Coates issued a statement in which he stated that he knew about Freeman's role at ConocoPhillips, that he initiated the conversation, and that Freeman did not "lobby" him or other SEC personnel.[5][7] Freeman said her actions did not violate rules and that her role at ConocoPhillips was "common knowledge" at Harvard.[2] Her Harvard colleague
Richard Lazarus agreed, saying there was "absolutely no conflict of interest" with her board role.[5]Norm Eisen, a government ethics specialist with the
Brookings Institution, told The Washington Post: "From an ethics perspective nobody has pointed to a specific violation here. It's ethical. Whether it's virtuous or not is a genuine question for other authorities to debate."[8] Freeman resigned from the ConocoPhillips board in August 2023. In a statement, she said she would focus on her research at Harvard and pursue new opportunities, including a book about environmental challenges and ideas for further progress.[7][9]
I would also like to propose removing the
Controversy section heading, per
WP:CRIT. Removing the section heading would place the proposed content under the
Board service and memberships section, which makes sense because the text is specifically about her role as an independent director of the ConocoPhillips board. Alternatively, if editors think a subsection heading is necessary for organizational purposes, then I propose changing the heading to "ConocoPhillips", which is neutral and more appropriate for a biography of a living person.
I believe the above text is accurate and neutral. It is a bit longer than the current text, but I believe this is necessary in order to fully explain the situation and present all sides. Can editors please review the proposed text and sources, and update the article appropriately?
User:Lewcm,
User:Spintendo, might you be available to review given your previous assistance above?
Done Looks much more balanced than the linked change, I've decided to keep a subheading to make the article easier to read and have gone with "ConocoPhillips" as you suggested within the board membership section. The controversy section was rather one-sided so it's a much needed improvement. Thanks, LewcmTalk to me!19:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Lewcm: Thank you for reviewing and updating the article. Since language in the article body has been made neutral, I would now like to propose an update to the introduction. I suggest removing the following text from the lead:
In August 2023, she resigned from her position as director of the board of ConocoPhillips, after more than one and a half years of criticism by Harvard students and faculty. She had denied having violated conflict of interest rules. Emails demonstrated she participated in the company's lobbying efforts to convince the Securities and Exchange Commission to weaken its climate risk disclosure rules.
I propose replacing with an overview of her board service and memberships, focusing on notable roles:
I'm happy to place this request in the COI queue for others to have a chance at reviewing, but I wanted to start with you since this request is related to the text you've just reviewed.