This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in
business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 February 2021
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
admin bearcat is removing factual evidence after being approved by daniel case. bearcat should receive a penalty. Jodie and Marc both dealt weed ( drug dealing) and opened illegal shops in canada before legalization to make a profit. They are very very very lucky since something this severe would be lots of prison time.This is why wikipedia is not a reliable source since users/admins are removing factual evidence for unknown reasons or bias. Please have the highest level review the edit disputes.
Fumarolo (
talk)
19:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Firstly, the article already goes into detail about the context of her notability, so there is no need to highlight the phrase "convicted drug dealer" in the introduction as if it were a central feature of her basic notability — she's notable as a marijuana legalization activist, not as a "drug dealer" per se. If she had been just a "drug dealer" but not an activist, she would not even have a Wikipedia article at all, so the introduction has to prioritize the thing she's notable for.
Secondly, there's no such thing as administrators "approving" content on Wikipedia. That's not how our process works: there's no way for an administrator to "approve" content before you add it to an article, the only thing an administrator can do is step in after problematic content has been added to the article. So you cannot claim that the content was "approved" as a reason to revert anybody who disputes it, because "approving" Wikipedia content isn't a thing that even exists in the first place.
Thirdly, you'll kindly note that numerous people, not just me, have literally been reverting you left and right over the entire week during which you've been a Wikipedia editor — which should be a clue that you're doing something wrong.
Fourthly, your edit history otherwise reveals that you've made numerous other unproductive and improper edits, including falsifying the name that a Canadian politician is even known by, and tendetious allegations about the sexual orientation of another politician just because he held a meet-and-greet in a gay bar during Pride — you've really made almost no contributions to Wikipedia of any value or merit at all, and have already managed to get editblocked for a day, yet you think you know better than actual long-standing Wikipedia contributors who have already asked you multiple times to discuss these matters rather than editwarring over them? Fascinating.
The content isn't automatically acceptable just because you want to add it — you need to justify it, by providing a compelling reason why the introduction needs to place the phrase "drug dealer" ahead of the activism that made her notable enough to even have an article in the first place.
Bearcat (
talk)
20:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)reply
she is not an activist though, it was a trick to justify them making money illegally. They were told multiple times to stop and raided but continued to operate. Defending a criminal is uncalled for. They also sold me wet bud at some point so I reported them. Both of them should receive atleast a decade in prison. don't defend money laundering criminals. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Fumarolo (
talk •
contribs)
20:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)reply
I'm not "defending" anybody — but Wikipedia has rules, and one of those rules is that we follow a
neutral point of view and are not a forum for random people's unsourced personal opinions. If you want this article to portray her activism as a front for money laundering, then you must show a
reliable source which explicitly states that she's been convicted of money laundering — and if you can't source it, then you can't say it on here at all.
You do realize that wet weed can be dried, right? So selling you wet weed isn't a reason to attack her as a criminal, when you can just stick the stuff in a bag of rice for a few hours. But it's fascinating to learn what this is really all about — not that it imbues your position with any authority or credibility, but it at least explains a few things.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)reply
wet weed with who knows what else. Stop defending criminals you are crazy.
Jodie Emery, 32, of Vancouver, was arrested and charged with:
Conspiracy to commit an indictable offence
Drug trafficking
Possession for the purpose of trafficking
Two counts of possession of the proceeds of crime. I will tell the courts to review her case. Shame on you Bearcat honestly
"Charged with" != "convicted of", and none of this equals "her activism was really just a front for money laundering" either. Wikipedia, again, has rules, and one of those rules is that we are not a forum for grinding axes with people you dislike. Honestly, go find yourself a new hobby.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Being charged with a crime merely means that the government has formally accused a person of a crime (as per google). This is worse than a conviction. In this case you are breaking wiki rules be siding with the article and glorifying illegal but whatever you say
Also, please read
WP:PERP before you go; being charged with a crime is not, in and of itself, grounds for a Wikipedia article, and is not "worse" than an actual conviction. People are innocent until proven guilty, not vice versa.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Canabis tax
I am contacting you about the Canabis shops and prices they are not affordable to low income people the prices are ridiculousness definitely priced like all MEDICATIONS way to HIGH and I am interested to where the taxes are going. Thank you just want to give my opinion.
Christine PURDABY
B 371 4 AVE SE
Salmon Arm BC
V1E1G4
christinepurdaby@gmail.com
2604:3D08:B97E:F00:F96B:9D0B:16A2:E2AF (
talk)
15:25, 4 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected edit request on 11 October 2022
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.