This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. There don't seem to be overwhelmingly compelling arguments or consensus here that either subject is the primary topic for the term.
ErikHaugen (
talk |
contribs)
04:33, 19 June 2012 (UTC)reply
– The historian has 181 views while the Prussian minister has 76 views. Therefore, the historian should be the primary topic. Relisted.
Jenks24 (
talk) 09:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Hoops gza (
talk)
01:59, 3 June 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose there is a third Job that needs an article. Pageviews in all cases are a little on the low side, so an assesssent of a primary topic is difficult. In this case I feel that leaving the main page as a disambiguation will serve as a honeypot for careless links wich can be disambiguated as and when they arrise. Then revisit the issue looking at the stats.
Agathoclea (
talk)
13:06, 6 June 2012 (UTC)reply
Support. The "third Job" is a non-notable "son of". The historian got
576 views in the last 90 days, the Prussian minister
259. I assume this is because the historian has a better written article. The minister is certainly the more notable figure off-Wiki, see
"Job von Witzleben" -wikipedia. The disambiguator "historian" is misleading. The subject's notably relates to the July 20 plot against Hitler. He was a nephew of conspirator
Erwin von Witzleben and had gossip to tell after the war.
Kauffner (
talk)
10:47, 13 June 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Note: Following closure of this RM a new RM was placed at