This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.
Agree. I disagree with the suggestion to use Flight 93 passenger as it is too unspecific, and it could lead to having to be too specific about where people where when applying the same convention to other victims who need disambiguation. Note this coincidence: another
Jeremy Glick lost his father in the same attack. --
David from Downunder (
talk)
15:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)reply
There is nothing POV about the phrase "attack victim". It is purely factual: (a) it was an attack; (b) he was a victim of that attack. Furthermore, the Wikipedia article about that event is called "September 11, 2001 attacks" and the word "victims" is used throughout the article numerous times - if it was POV then the article would not be so. --
David from Downunder (
talk)
06:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.